|
ROMINGER
LEGAL
|
||||||||||
|
Ohio Court Cases and Opinions -
Ohio Legal Research
|
||||||||||
| Need Legal Help? | ||||||||||
|
NOT
FINDING WHAT YOU NEED? -RESEARCH
|
||||||||||
This
court case was taken from the web sites of the Ohio Courts. Search
our site for more cases - CLICK
HERE |
|
|
Case Law - save on Lexis / WestLaw. ATTENTION DIRECT ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THE ANNOUNCEMENT TO WALTER S. KOBALKA, REPORTER OF DECISIONS, OR JUSTINE MICHAEL, ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT, AT (614) 466-4961 OR 1-800-826-9010. SUPREME COURT OF OHIO COLUMBUS ANNOUNCEMENT WEDNESDAY August 19, 1992 DISMISSALS, SUA SPONTE, NO SUBSTANTIAL CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION AND JURISDICTIONAL MOTIONS OVERRULED 92-935. State v. Nave. Wood County, No. 92WD015. Resnick, J., not participating. MOTION DOCKET 90-1914. State v. Franklin. Hamilton County, No. C-890028. UPON CONSIDERATION of the motion filed by counsel for appellant to stay the execution of sentence in the above-styled cause pending the exhaustion of state post-conviction remedies, IT IS ORDERED by the court that said motion be, and the same is hereby, granted, effective August 18, 1992. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that said stay is granted for a period of six months to allow appellant an opportunity to file a petition for post-conviction relief. Absent such a filing within said time period, this stay will expire, and no further time will be granted except in unusual circumstances. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that if a petition for post-conviction relief has been filed within the time allotted, a date-stamped copy of such petition shall be filed by appellant with the Clerk of this court, and this stay shall remain in effect until exhaustion of all state post-conviction proceedings, including any appeals. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the compliance with the mandate and execution of sentence be, and the same are hereby, stayed for a period of six months or, if a petition for post-conviction relief is filed within that time period, pending the exhaustion of all proceedings for post-conviction relief before courts of this state. JURISDICTIONAL MOTIONS ALLOWED 92-948. Ohio Office of Collective Bargaining v. Ohio Civil Serv. Emp. Assn., Local 11, AFSCME, AFL-CIO. Franklin County, No. 91AP-681. On motion to certify the record and on motion for leave to file amicus of Ohio Association of Public School Employees. Motions granted. Moyer, C.J., Holmes and Wright, JJ., dissent. MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS 92-858. State v. Cadwallader. Cuyahoga County, No. 60006. Sua sponte, cause dismissed for want of prosecution, effective August 17, 1992. 92-1165. Jackson v. Regional Transit Auth. Cuyahoga County, No. 60443. Sua sponte, cause dismissed for want of prosecution, effective August 17, 1992. 92-1300. Warren v. Franklin Twp. Zoning Bd. of Appeals. Portage County, No. 91-P-2346. Sua sponte, cause dismissed for want of prosecution, effective August 17, 1992. 92-1442. Helle v. Peerless Constr. Co. Wood County, No. 91-WD-069. Cause dismissed, on appellant's application for dismissal, effective August 18, 1992. |
|
|
NOW - CASE
LAW - All 50 States - Federal Courts - Try
it for FREE
We
now have full text legal news
drawn from all the major sources!!
Pennsylvania Lawyer Help Board
Find An Attorney
TERMS
OF USE - DISCLAIMER - LINKING POLICIES
Created and Developed by
Rominger Legal
Copyright 1997 - 2010.
A Division of
ROMINGER, INC.