8/19/1992 Case Announcements - Ohio Supreme Court Opinion - Ohio Supreme Court Decision

	ROMINGER LEGAL
		Ohio Court Cases and Opinions - Ohio Legal Research
					Need Legal Help?
					Need Legal Help?
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER			LEGAL HEADLINES - CASE LAW - LEGAL FORMS	NOT FINDING WHAT YOU NEED? -RESEARCH

This court case was taken from the web sites of the Ohio Courts. Search our site for more cases - CLICK HERE

LEGAL RESEARCH

COURT REPORTERS

PRIVATE INVESTIGATORS

PROCESS SERVERS

DOCUMENT RETRIEVERS

EXPERT WITNESSES

Find a Private Investigator

Find an Expert Witness

Find a Process Server

Case Law - save on Lexis / WestLaw.

Legal News - Legal Headlines

ATTENTION
DIRECT ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THE ANNOUNCEMENT TO WALTER S. KOBALKA,
REPORTER OF DECISIONS, OR JUSTINE MICHAEL, ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT, AT
(614) 466-4961 OR 1-800-826-9010.

SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

COLUMBUS

ANNOUNCEMENT

9:00 A.M. WEDNESDAY
August 19, 1992

MOTION DOCKET

92-1205. State ex rel. Taylor v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth.
In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a
complaint for a writ of mandamus. Upon consideration of respondent's
motion to take the deposition of Patrick Taylor, an inmate incarcerated
at the Chillicothe Correctional Institution,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that said motion to take deposition be,
and the same is hereby, granted, effective August 12, 1992.

92-1346. State ex rel. Crenshaw v. Morris.
In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a
complaint for a writ of mandamus. Upon consideration of respondents'
motion to take the deposition of Donald Crenshaw, an inmate incarcerated
at the Chillicothe Correctional Institution,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that said motion to take deposition be,
and the same is hereby, granted, effective August 12, 1992.
Douglas, J., dissents and would dismiss the cause because there is an
adequate remedy at law.

92-1531. State ex rel. Reichenbach v. Routson.
In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a
complaint for a writ of mandamus. Upon consideration of relator's motion
for stay,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that said motion for stay be, and the same
is hereby, denied, effective August 11, 1992.
Wright, J., not participating.

92-1577. George v. Coyne.
In Quo Warranto. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a
complaint for a writ of quo warranto. Upon consideration of relator's
request for temporary restraining order,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that said motion for temporary restraining

order be, and the same is hereby, denied, effective August 12, 1992.

JURISDICTIONAL MOTIONS ALLOWED

92-823. Gallimore v. Children's Hosp. Med. Ctr.
Hamilton County, Nos. C-890808 and C-890824. On motion and cross-motion
to certify the record. Cause allowed on Proposition of Law No. I only.
Douglas, J., would allow the entire cause.
Moyer, C.J., Sweeney and Holmes, JJ., dissent.
John W. McCormac, J., of the Tenth Appellate District, sitting for
Resnick, J.

DISCIPLINARY DOCKET

92-1342. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Sullivan.
On written request of respondent, it is ordered that the time for
filing objections is hereby extended to August 10, 1992.
Wright, J., not participating.