6/26/1992 Case Announcements - Ohio Supreme Court Opinion - Ohio Supreme Court Decision

	ROMINGER LEGAL
		Ohio Court Cases and Opinions - Ohio Legal Research
					Need Legal Help?
					Need Legal Help?
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER			LEGAL HEADLINES - CASE LAW - LEGAL FORMS	NOT FINDING WHAT YOU NEED? -RESEARCH

This court case was taken from the web sites of the Ohio Courts. Search our site for more cases - CLICK HERE

LEGAL RESEARCH

COURT REPORTERS

PRIVATE INVESTIGATORS

PROCESS SERVERS

DOCUMENT RETRIEVERS

EXPERT WITNESSES

Find a Private Investigator

Find an Expert Witness

Find a Process Server

Case Law - save on Lexis / WestLaw.

Legal News - Legal Headlines

ATTENTION
DIRECT ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THE ANNOUNCEMENT TO WALTER S. KOBALKA,
REPORTER OF DECISIONS, OR JUSTINE MICHAEL, ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT, AT
(614) 466-4961 OR 1-800-826-9010.

SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

COLUMBUS

ANNOUNCEMENT

FRIDAY
June 26, 1992

MOTION DOCKET

89-2128. State v. Jackson.
Cuyahoga County, No. 55758. UPON CONSIDERATION of the motion filed by
counsel for appellant to continue stay of execution in the above-styled
cause pending the exhaustion of state post-conviction remedies,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that said motion be, and the same is
hereby, granted, effective June 25, 1992.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that compliance with the mandate
and execution of sentence be, and the same are hereby, stayed pending the
exhaustion of all proceedings for post-conviction relief before courts of
this state.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel for the appellant and for the
appellee shall notify this court when all proceedings for post-conviction
relief before courts of this state have been exhausted.

92-995. State ex rel. Gampfer v. Wilkinson.
Franklin County, No. 91AP-809. This cause is pending before the court as
an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County. Upon
consideration of appellants' motion to stay the writ of mandamus issued
by the Court of Appeals for the Tenth Appellate District pending final
disposition by this court,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that said motion for stay be, and the same
is hereby, granted, effective June 25, 1992.
Douglas, J., dissents.

92-1181. State ex rel. Ohio Mech. Contr. Indus., Inc. v. Cleveland.
In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a
complaint for a writ of mandamus. Upon consideration of relators' motion
for expedited consideration and motion for peremptory or alternative writ
of mandamus,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that said motion for expedited
consideration be, and the same is hereby, granted, effective June 23,
1992.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that relators' request for
peremptory writ in the first instance be, and the same is hereby, denied,
effective June 23, 1992.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that relators' motion for
alternative writ be, and the same is hereby, granted, and the city of
Cleveland is ordered to refrain from awarding a contract or contracts for
the "Charles V. Carr Municipal/South Building Renovations" until further
order of this court. It is further ordered by the court that respondents
show cause on or before July 13, 1992, why a peremptory writ should not
be issued.

JURISDICTIONAL MOTIONS ALLOWED

92-413. Ziegler v. Wendel Poultry Serv.
Crawford County, No. 3-90-31. On motion (notices of appeal of Wendel
Poultry and B. Ziegler) and cross-motion to certify the record. Motions
allowed.
Holmes and Resnick, JJ., dissent.
John W. McCormac, J., of the Tenth Appellate District, sitting for
Moyer, C.J.
G. Gary Tyack, J., of the Tenth Appellate District, sitting for
Wright, J.

MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS

92-514. Beckman v. Indian Hill Club, Inc.
Hamilton County, No. C-910159. This cause is pending before the court on
the filing of a cross-motion for an order directing the Court of Appeals
for Hamilton County to certify its record. Upon consideration of
appellee/cross-appellant's application to dismiss cross-appeal,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that said application be, and the same is
hereby, granted, effective June 23, 1992.
ACCORDINGLY, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be,
and hereby is, dismissed.

92-958. State ex rel. Champion Internl. Corp. v. Indus. Comm.
Franklin County, No. 91AP-472. Cause dismissed, on appellant's
application to dismiss, effective June 24, 1992.

92-960. State v. Andrews.
Cuyahoga County, Nos. 34620 and 39712. Sua sponte, cause dismissed for
want of prosecution.