10/21/1992 Case Announcements - Ohio Supreme Court Opinion - Ohio Supreme Court Decision

	ROMINGER LEGAL
		Ohio Court Cases and Opinions - Ohio Legal Research
					Need Legal Help?
					Need Legal Help?
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER			LEGAL HEADLINES - CASE LAW - LEGAL FORMS	NOT FINDING WHAT YOU NEED? -RESEARCH

This court case was taken from the web sites of the Ohio Courts. Search our site for more cases - CLICK HERE

LEGAL RESEARCH

COURT REPORTERS

PRIVATE INVESTIGATORS

PROCESS SERVERS

DOCUMENT RETRIEVERS

EXPERT WITNESSES

Find a Private Investigator

Find an Expert Witness

Find a Process Server

Case Law - save on Lexis / WestLaw.

Legal News - Legal Headlines

ATTENTION
DIRECT ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THE ANNOUNCEMENT TO WALTER S. KOBALKA,
REPORTER OF DECISIONS, OR JUSTINE MICHAEL, ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT, AT
(614) 466-4961 OR 1-800-826-9010.

SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

COLUMBUS

ANNOUNCEMENT

WEDNESDAY
October 21, 1992

MERIT DOCKET

92-1938. State ex rel. Yiamouyiannis v. Taft.
In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a
complaint for a writ of mandamus regarding an expedited election matter.
Upon consideration of respondents' motions to dismiss, respondents'
motion for judgment on the pleadings, and relator's motion for default
judgment,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that said motions be, and the same are
hereby, overruled, effective October 19, 1992.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the writ of mandamus be, and
the same is hereby, denied.
Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick,
JJ., concur.

MOTION DOCKET

92-2042. State v. Angelo.
Cuyahoga County, Nos. 61141 and 61049. This cause is pending before the
court on the filing of a motion for leave to appeal from the Court of
Appeals for Cuyahoga County and as a claimed appeal as of right from said
court. Upon consideration of appellant's motion for bond and suspension
of execution of sentence pending appeal to the Supreme Court of Ohio,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that said motion be, and the same is
hereby, granted, effective October 19, 1992.
Resnick, J., dissents.

MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS

92-282. St. Elizabeth Hosp. Med. Ctr. v. Moliterno.
Mahoning County, No. 89 C.A. 185. This cause, here on appeal from the
Court of Appeals for Mahoning County, was considered in the manner
prescribed by law. Upon consideration of the joint application to
dismiss this appeal at appellee's costs,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that said application be, and the same is
hereby, granted, effective October 20, 1992.

92-556. State ex rel. Smith v. O'Connor.
In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a
complaint for a writ of prohibition. Upon consideration of relators'
application to dismiss,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that said application be, and the same is
hereby, granted, effective October 20, 1992.
ACCORDINGLY, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be,
and hereby is, dismissed.

92-1516. Woerner v. Mentor Exempted Village School Dist. Bd. of Edn.
Lake County, No. 91-L-085. Cause dismissed, on appellant's application
for dismissal, effective October 20, 1992.

92-1898. State ex rel. Gumpl v. Spicer.
In Mandamus/Procedendo and Prohibition. This cause originated in this
court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus/procedendo and
prohibition. Upon consideration of relator's application to dismiss,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that said application be, and the same is
hereby, granted, effective October 16, 1992.
ACCORDINGLY, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be,
and hereby is, dismissed.

92-2028. Weber v. Clinton Twp. Bd. of Zoning Appeals.
Fulton County, No. 91FU000027. Cause dismissed, on appellant's
application for dismissal, effective October 20, 1992.

92-2040. Selonick v. Cincinnati.
Hamilton County, No. C-920750. Cause dismissed, on appellants'
application for dismissal, effective October 16, 1992.