State ex rel. Johnson v. Slaby - Ohio Supreme Court Opinion - Ohio Supreme Court Decision

	ROMINGER LEGAL
		Ohio Court Cases and Opinions - Ohio Legal Research
					Need Legal Help?
					Need Legal Help?
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER			LEGAL HEADLINES - CASE LAW - LEGAL FORMS	NOT FINDING WHAT YOU NEED? -RESEARCH

This court case was taken from the web sites of the Ohio Courts. Search our site for more cases - CLICK HERE

LEGAL RESEARCH

COURT REPORTERS

PRIVATE INVESTIGATORS

PROCESS SERVERS

DOCUMENT RETRIEVERS

EXPERT WITNESSES

Find a Private Investigator

Find an Expert Witness

Find a Process Server

Case Law - save on Lexis / WestLaw.

Legal News - Legal Headlines

OPINIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
The full texts of the opinions of the Supreme Court of
Ohio are being transmitted electronically beginning May 27,
1992, pursuant to a pilot project implemented by Chief Justice
Thomas J. Moyer.
Please call any errors to the attention of the Reporter's
Office of the Supreme Court of Ohio. Attention: Walter S.
Kobalka, Reporter, or Deborah J. Barrett, Administrative
Assistant. Tel.: (614) 466-4961; in Ohio 1-800-826-9010.
Your comments on this pilot project are also welcome.
NOTE: Corrections may be made by the Supreme Court to the
full texts of the opinions after they have been released
electronically to the public. The reader is therefore advised
to check the bound volumes of Ohio St.3d published by West
Publishing Company for the final versions of these opinions.
The advance sheets to Ohio St.3d will also contain the volume
and page numbers where the opinions will be found in the bound
volumes of the Ohio Official Reports.

[The State ex rel.] Johnson, Appellant, v. Slaby, Prosecuting
Attorney, Appellee.
[Cite as State ex rel. Johnson v. Slaby (1993), Ohio
St.3d .]
Public records -- Custodian of public records has no duty under
R.C. 149.43(B) to transmit copies of those records by mail.
(No. 93-1048 -- Submitted August 16, 1993 -- Decided
November 10, 1993.)
Appeal from the Court of Appeals for Summit County, No.
15965.
Appellant, Kenneth Johnson, filed a "petition" for a writ
of mandamus in the court of appeals to compel appellee, Lynn C.
Slaby, Summit County Prosecuting Attorney, to supply him with
certain photographs taken in a criminal case. Appellee filed a
motion to dismiss, alleging that appellant had no clear legal
right to receive the records, and that the photographs were
"viewable by Petitioner's counsel at the Ninth District Court
of Appeals." The court of appeals granted the motion to
dismiss, citing State ex rel. Nelson v. Fuerst (1993), 66 Ohio
St.3d 47, 607 N.E.2d 836, and State ex rel. Fenley v. Ohio
Historical Soc. (1992), 64 Ohio St.3d 509, 597 N.E.2d 120.
Those cases held that a public agency has no duty to mail
public records.
The cause is before the court upon an appeal as of right.

Kenneth Johnson, pro se.
Lynn C. Slaby, Summit County Prosecuting Attorney, and
Philip D. Bogdanoff, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for
appellee.

Per Curiam. The decision of the court of appeals is
affirmed based on Nelson and Fenley, supra.
Judgment affirmed.
Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick and
F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur.
Pfeifer, J., dissents.

Pfeifer, J., dissenting. Johnson never sought to

require the prosecutor to mail him the photographs in
question. He only sought to have copies of the photographs be
made available to his agent. Thus, the majority's reliance on
State ex rel. Nelson v. Fuerst (1993), 66 Ohio St.3d 47, 607
N.E.2d 836, and State ex rel. Fenley v. Ohio Historical Soc.
(1992), 64 Ohio St.3d 509, 597 N.E.2d 120, which concern the
duty to mail public records, is misplaced.
The real issue is whether Johnson should have access to
the photographs. For the reasons stated in my dissent in State
ex. rel. Lawhorn v. White (1993), 67 Ohio St.3d 158, 159, 616
N.E.2d 888, 889, I would require the prosecutor to make
available to Johnson copies of all the requested photographs.