|
ROMINGER
LEGAL
|
||||||||||
|
Ohio Court Cases and Opinions -
Ohio Legal Research
|
||||||||||
| Need Legal Help? | ||||||||||
|
NOT
FINDING WHAT YOU NEED? -RESEARCH
|
||||||||||
This
court case was taken from the web sites of the Ohio Courts. Search
our site for more cases - CLICK
HERE |
|
|
Case Law - save on Lexis / WestLaw. OPINIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO The full texts of the opinions of the Supreme Court of Ohio are being transmitted electronically beginning May 27, 1992, pursuant to a pilot project implemented by Chief Justice Thomas J. Moyer. Please call any errors to the attention of the Reporter's Office of the Supreme Court of Ohio. Attention: Walter S. Kobalka, Reporter, or Deborah J. Barrett, Administrative Assistant. Tel.: (614) 466-4961; in Ohio 1-800-826-9010. Your comments on this pilot project are also welcome. NOTE: Corrections may be made by the Supreme Court to the full texts of the opinions after they have been released electronically to the public. The reader is therefore advised to check the bound volumes of Ohio St.3d published by West Publishing Company for the final versions of these opinions. The advance sheets to Ohio St.3d will also contain the volume and page numbers where the opinions will be found in the bound volumes of the Ohio Official Reports. The State ex rel. Parker, Appellant, v. Ohio Parole Board et al., Appellees. [Cite as State ex rel. Parker v. Ohio Parole Bd. (1993), Ohio St.3d .] Writ of habeas corpus seeking relief from confinement -- Petition dismissed for failure to comply with R.C. 2725.04(D). (No. 93-264 -- Submitted August 16, 1993 -- Decided December 8, 1993.) Appeal from the Court of Appeals for Allen County, No. 1-92-106. Appellant, Keith Parker, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the Court of Appeals for Allen County, alleging that appellees, the Ohio Parole Board and its members, denied him due process of law by not granting him a parole. The court of appeals dismissed the cause because appellant did not attach to the petition a copy of the commitment or cause of detention, as required by R.C. 2725.04(D). The cause is before the court upon an appeal as of right. Keith Parker, pro se. Per Curiam. The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed based on Bloss v. Rogers (1992), 65 Ohio St.3d 145, 602 N.E.2d 602. Judgment affirmed. Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. |
|
|
NOW - CASE
LAW - All 50 States - Federal Courts - Try
it for FREE
We
now have full text legal news
drawn from all the major sources!!
Pennsylvania Lawyer Help Board
Find An Attorney
TERMS
OF USE - DISCLAIMER - LINKING POLICIES
Created and Developed by
Rominger Legal
Copyright 1997 - 2010.
A Division of
ROMINGER, INC.