|
ROMINGER
LEGAL
|
||||||||||
|
Ohio Court Cases and Opinions -
Ohio Legal Research
|
||||||||||
| Need Legal Help? | ||||||||||
|
NOT
FINDING WHAT YOU NEED? -RESEARCH
|
||||||||||
This
court case was taken from the web sites of the Ohio Courts. Search
our site for more cases - CLICK
HERE |
|
|
Case Law - save on Lexis / WestLaw. ATTENTION DIRECT ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THE ANNOUNCEMENT TO WALTER S. KOBALKA, REPORTER OF DECISIONS, AND DEBORAH J. BARRETT AT (614) 466-4961 OR 1-800-826-9010. SUPREME COURT OF OHIO COLUMBUS ANNOUNCEMENT 9:00 A.M. WEDNESDAY October 13, 1993 MERIT DOCKET 92-1937. State ex rel. Richard v. O'Donnell. Cuyahoga County. Appeal from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 63886. Judgment affirmed. Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. 92-2081. State ex rel. Waddle v. Indus. Comm. Franklin County. Appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 91AP-1331. Judgment affirmed. Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. 93-611. Flora v. Rogers. Marion County. Appeal from the Court of Appeals for Marion County, No. 9-93-9. Judgment affirmed. Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. 93-695. State ex rel. Aloi v. Klide. Stark County. Appeal from the Court of Appeals for Stark County, No. CA-9233. Judgment affirmed. Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. 93-908. State ex rel. Baker v. Schiemann. Cuyahoga County. Appeal from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 65163. Judgment affirmed. Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. 93-959. State ex rel. Jackson v. McMonagle. Cuyahoga County. Appeal from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 65070. Judgment affirmed. Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. 93-1127. State v. Kuhajda. Portage County. Appeal from the Court of Appeals for Portage County, No. 92-P-0050. Judgment reversed. A.W. Sweeney, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., and Douglas, J., dissent. 93-1135. State v. Barnett. Seneca County. Certified by the Court of Appeals for Seneca County, No. 13-92-03. Judgment affirmed. A.W. Sweeney, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., and Douglas, J., dissent. JURISDICTIONAL MOTIONS ALLOWED 93-1127. State v. Kuhajda. Portage County, No. 92-P-0050. Moyer, C.J., and Douglas, J., dissent. SUPREME COURT OF OHIO COLUMBUS ANNOUNCEMENT WEDNESDAY October 13, 1993 MOTION DOCKET 91-2137. State v. Campbell. Hamilton County, No. C-890330. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County. Upon consideration of appellant's motion to supplement merit brief with additional proposition of law, IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion to supplement merit brief be, and the same is hereby, granted, effective October 8, 1993. 93-1986. Esparra v. Mahoning Cty. Bd. of Elections. Mahoning County, No. 93 C.A. 177. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Mahoning County. Upon consideration of appellant's motion to expedite, IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion to expedite be, and the same is hereby, granted, effective October 8, 1993, and all briefs are due on or before October 13, 1993. DISCIPLINARY DOCKET 93-1678. Pagac v. Disciplinary Counsel. This cause is pending before the court upon the filing by movant, Paul Pagac III, of a motion to dismiss, motion for leave to file amended motion for summary judgment, and amended motion for summary judgment. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motions be, and the same are hereby, denied, effective October 8, 1993. SUPREME COURT OF OHIO COLUMBUS ANNOUNCEMENT WEDNESDAY October 13, 1993 DISCIPLINARY DOCKET 90-2092. Trumbull Cty. Bar Assn. v. Landers. On motion of Robert T. Landers, Attorney Registration No. 0000907, to terminate probation. Motion granted. For earlier case, see Trumbull Cty. Bar Assn. v. Landers (1991), 61 Ohio St.3d 88, 572 N.E.2d 677. ADMINISTRATIVE DOCKET 1. Proposed amendments to the Ohio Rules of Evidence, Civil Procedure, Criminal Procedure, Appellate Procedure, and Juvenile Procedure will be published for a thirty-day public-comment period. 2. Proposed amendments to Gov.Bar R. X and Gov.Jud.R. IV and V will be published for a thirty-day public-comment period. 3. Proposed amendments to C.A.Sup.R. 3 and 99 (judicial bypass of parental notification of abortion) will be published for a thirty-day public-comment period. 4. Proposed amendments to DR 1-102 and EC 1-7 (non-discrimination) will be published for a thirty-day public-comment period. |
|
|
NOW - CASE
LAW - All 50 States - Federal Courts - Try
it for FREE
We
now have full text legal news
drawn from all the major sources!!
Pennsylvania Lawyer Help Board
Find An Attorney
TERMS
OF USE - DISCLAIMER - LINKING POLICIES
Created and Developed by
Rominger Legal
Copyright 1997 - 2010.
A Division of
ROMINGER, INC.