State ex rel. Yonkings v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr. - Ohio Supreme Court Opinion - Ohio Supreme Court Decision

	ROMINGER LEGAL
		Ohio Court Cases and Opinions - Ohio Legal Research
					Need Legal Help?
					Need Legal Help?
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER			LEGAL HEADLINES - CASE LAW - LEGAL FORMS	NOT FINDING WHAT YOU NEED? -RESEARCH

This court case was taken from the web sites of the Ohio Courts. Search our site for more cases - CLICK HERE

LEGAL RESEARCH

COURT REPORTERS

PRIVATE INVESTIGATORS

PROCESS SERVERS

DOCUMENT RETRIEVERS

EXPERT WITNESSES

Find a Private Investigator

Find an Expert Witness

Find a Process Server

Case Law - save on Lexis / WestLaw.

Legal News - Legal Headlines

OPINIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
The full texts of the opinions of the Supreme Court of
Ohio are being transmitted electronically beginning May 27,
1992, pursuant to a pilot project implemented by Chief Justice
Thomas J. Moyer.
Please call any errors to the attention of the Reporter's
Office of the Supreme Court of Ohio. Attention: Walter S.
Kobalka, Reporter, or Deborah J. Barrett, Administrative
Assistant. Tel.: (614) 466-4961; in Ohio 1-800-826-9010.
Your comments on this pilot project are also welcome.
NOTE: Corrections may be made by the Supreme Court to the
full texts of the opinions after they have been released
electronically to the public. The reader is therefore advised
to check the bound volumes of Ohio St.3d published by West
Publishing Company for the final versions of these opinions.
The advance sheets to Ohio St.3d will also contain the volume
and page numbers where the opinions will be found in the bound
volumes of the Ohio Official Reports.

The State ex rel. Yonkings, Appellant, v. Ohio Department of
Rehabilitation and Correction et al., Appellees.
[Cite as State ex rel. Yonkings v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.
(1994), Ohio St.3d .]
Mandamus to compel prison officials to perform act of self-
execution of relator's multiple definite sentences -- Writ
denied, when.
(No. 93-2552 -- Submitted March 1, 1994 -- Decided April
20, 1994.)
Appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County,
No.93AP-655.

Charles B. Yonkings, pro se.
Lee I. Fisher, Attorney General, and Joshua T. Cox,
Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

Per Curiam. The judgment of the court of appeals is
affirmed for the reason stated in the court's opinion, i.e.,
declaratory judgment provides an adequate remedy to appellant
and its availability was thus an appropriate basis to deny the
writ. State ex rel. Citizens for Fair Taxation v. Lucas Cty.
Bd. of Commrs. (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 749, 752, 591 N.E.2d 691,
693; State ex rel. Fenske v. McGovern (1984), 11 Ohio St.3d
129, 11 OBR 426, 464 N.E.2d 525, paragraph two of the syllabus;
R.C. 2731.05.
Judgment affirmed.
Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E.
Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.