Snyder v. Johnstown-Monroe Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn. - Ohio Supreme Court Opinion - Ohio Supreme Court Decision

	ROMINGER LEGAL
		Ohio Court Cases and Opinions - Ohio Legal Research
					Need Legal Help?
					Need Legal Help?
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER			LEGAL HEADLINES - CASE LAW - LEGAL FORMS	NOT FINDING WHAT YOU NEED? -RESEARCH

This court case was taken from the web sites of the Ohio Courts. Search our site for more cases - CLICK HERE

LEGAL RESEARCH

COURT REPORTERS

PRIVATE INVESTIGATORS

PROCESS SERVERS

DOCUMENT RETRIEVERS

EXPERT WITNESSES

Find a Private Investigator

Find an Expert Witness

Find a Process Server

Case Law - save on Lexis / WestLaw.

Legal News - Legal Headlines

OPINIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
The full texts of the opinions of the Supreme Court of
Ohio are being transmitted electronically beginning May 27,
1992, pursuant to a pilot project implemented by Chief Justice
Thomas J. Moyer.
Please call any errors to the attention of the Reporter's
Office of the Supreme Court of Ohio. Attention: Walter S.
Kobalka, Reporter, or Deborah J. Barrett, Administrative
Assistant. Tel.: (614) 466-4961; in Ohio 1-800-826-9010.
Your comments on this pilot project are also welcome.
NOTE: Corrections may be made by the Supreme Court to the
full texts of the opinions after they have been released
electronically to the public. The reader is therefore advised
to check the bound volumes of Ohio St.3d published by West
Publishing Company for the final versions of these opinions.
The advance sheets to Ohio St.3d will also contain the volume
and page numbers where the opinions will be found in the bound
volumes of the Ohio Official Reports.

Snyder, Appellee, v. Board of Education of the Johnstown-Monroe
Local School District, Appellant.
[Cite as Snyder v. Johnstown-Monroe Local School Dist. Bd. of
Edn. (1994), Ohio St. 3d .]
Schools -- Teachers -- Nonrenewal of limited teaching contract
-- Procedural provisions of R.C. Chapter 2506 provide
procedure that must be followed in an appeal pursuant to
R.C. 3319.11.
(No. 93-1218 -- April 6, 1994 -- Decided May 11, 1994.)
Appeal from the Court of Appeals for Licking County, No.
92-CA-92.

Martin, Pergram, Browning & Parker Co., L.P.A., and Dennis
L. Pergram, for appellee.
Robert L. Becker, Licking County Prosecuting Attorney, and
David Q. Wigginton, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for
appellant.

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on
authority of Kiel v. Green Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn.
(1994), Ohio St.3d , N.E.2d , paragraph one of
the syllabus, and also for the reasons stated in the opinion of
the court of appeals.
This cause is remanded to the trial court to apply the law
as set forth in Kiel.
A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer,
JJ., concur.
Moyer, C.J., and Wright, J. concurs in part and dissent in
part.
Wright, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part.
I concur in the result obtained in this cause. I continue to
disagree with the reasoning stated in Kiel v. Green Local
School Dist. Bd. of Edn. (1994), 69 Ohio St.3d 149,
N.E.2d , for the reasons stated in my dissent therein.
Moyer, C.J., concurs in the foregoing opinion.