|
ROMINGER
LEGAL
|
||||||||||
|
Ohio Court Cases and Opinions -
Ohio Legal Research
|
||||||||||
| Need Legal Help? | ||||||||||
|
NOT
FINDING WHAT YOU NEED? -RESEARCH
|
||||||||||
This
court case was taken from the web sites of the Ohio Courts. Search
our site for more cases - CLICK
HERE |
|
|
Case Law - save on Lexis / WestLaw. ATTENTION DIRECT ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THE ANNOUNCEMENT TO WALTER S. KOBALKA, REPORTER OF DECISIONS, AND DEBORAH J. BARRETT AT (614) 466-4961 OR 1-800-826-9010. SUPREME COURT OF OHIO COLUMBUS ANNOUNCEMENT TUESDAY December 6, 1994 MOTION DOCKET 90-22. State v. Waddy. Franklin County, Nos. 87AP-1159 and 87AP-1160. On July 9, 1992, this court stayed the execution of sentence in this cause pending a decision of the United States Supreme Court on appellant's petition for writ of certiorari. On October 5, 1994, appellee filed a motion to set execution date. It appearing to the court that, on October 13, 1992, the Supreme Court of the United States entered an order in No. 92-5531, Warren Waddy v. Ohio, which stated: "On consideration of the petition for a writ of certiorari herein to the Supreme Court of Ohio, IT IS ORDERED by this Court that said petition be, and the same is hereby, denied." Upon consideration that the stay of execution of sentence granted by this court on July 9, 1992, was conditioned upon final disposition of appellant's petition to the Supreme Court of the United States, and it appearing to this court that the Supreme Court of the United States has rendered a final disposition of the petition, IT IS ORDERED that the stay of execution is hereby terminated as of the date of this entry, December 5, 1994. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED by this court that the sentence be carried into execution by the Warden of the Southern Ohio Correctional Facility or, in his absence, by the Deputy Warden on Monday, the 6th day of March, 1995, in accordance with the statutes so provided. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certified copy of this entry and a warrant under the seal of this court be duly certified to the Warden of the Southern Ohio Correctional Facility and that the Warden shall make due return thereof to the Clerk of the Court of Common Pleas of Franklin County. 91-2137. State v. Campbell. Hamilton County, No. C-890330. UPON CONSIDERATION of the motion filed by counsel for appellant to stay the execution of sentence in the above-styled cause pending the exhaustion of state post-conviction remedies, IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion be, and is hereby, granted, effective December 5, 1994. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that, pursuant to State v. Glenn (1987), 33 Ohio St. 3d 601, 514 N.E.2d 869, a stay is granted for a period of six months, beginning November 14, 1994, and ending May 14, 1995, to allow appellant an opportunity to file a petition for post-conviction relief. If a petition for post-conviction relief is not filed within the time allotted, this stay will expire. No further time for the filing of the petition will be granted except in unusual circumstances. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that, if a petition for post-conviction relief is filed within the time allotted, a date-stamped copy of the petition shall be filed by appellant with the Clerk of this court, and this stay shall remain in effect until exhaustion of all state post-conviction proceedings, including any appeals. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that compliance with the mandate and execution of sentence be, and is hereby, stayed for the six-month period allotted by this order and, if a petition for post-conviction relief is filed within the time allotted, pending the exhaustion of all proceedings for post-conviction relief before the courts of this state. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel for the appellant and for the appellee shall notify this court when all proceedings for post-conviction relief before courts of this state have been exhausted. MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS 94-2266. Erie Ins. Co. v. Kiser. Ashland County, Nos. CA-1078 and CA-1070. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and as a claimed appeal of right. Upon consideration of appellant's application for dismissal, IT IS ORDERED by the court that said application be, and the same is hereby, granted, effective December 2, 1994. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed. |
|
|
NOW - CASE
LAW - All 50 States - Federal Courts - Try
it for FREE
We
now have full text legal news
drawn from all the major sources!!
Pennsylvania Lawyer Help Board
Find An Attorney
TERMS
OF USE - DISCLAIMER - LINKING POLICIES
Created and Developed by
Rominger Legal
Copyright 1997 - 2010.
A Division of
ROMINGER, INC.