ROMINGER
LEGAL
Ohio Court Cases and Opinions -
Ohio Legal Research
NOT
FINDING WHAT YOU NEED? -RESEARCH
|
ROMINGER
LEGAL
|
||||||||||
|
Ohio Court Cases and Opinions -
Ohio Legal Research
|
||||||||||
| Need Legal Help? | ||||||||||
|
NOT
FINDING WHAT YOU NEED? -RESEARCH
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This
court case was taken from the web sites of the Ohio Courts. Search
our site for more cases - CLICK
HERE |
|
|
Case Law - save on Lexis / WestLaw.
SUPREME COURT OF OHIO COLUMBUS ANNOUNCEMENT THURSDAY June 6, 1996 DISCIPLINARY DOCKET 95-2367. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Matho. On November 17, 1995, movant, Cincinnati Bar Association, filed a motion to show cause, requesting this court to issue an order directing respondents, Eugene and Marilyn T. Matho, to show cause why they should not be held in contempt for failure or refusal, without just cause or just excuse, to obey the subpoenas duces tecum issued by the Board of Commissioners on the Unauthorized Practice of Law. On December 7, 1995, this court granted the motion and ordered respondents to show cause why they should not be held in contempt. Respondents did not file a response. On February 12, 1996, this court found respondents in contempt and ordered them to appear before the court. On March 26, 1996, this court ordered respondents to purge themselves of contempt by scheduling a meeting with the Cincinnati Bar Association at which time they would comply with the subpoenas duces tecum. On May 7, 1996, movant filed a report stating that respondents complied with the original subpoenas and that it was movant's opinion that respondents have purged themselves of contempt. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED by the court that respondents be, and hereby are, purged of contempt, and that Supreme Court case No. 95-2367 is hereby dismissed. It is further ordered that the dismissal of this case does not affect any investigation of respondents that may be conducted by the Cincinnati Bar Association's Unauthorized Practice of Law Committee. MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS 96-1274. State ex rel. Berman v. Russo. In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition. Upon consideration of relator's expedited motion for stay of common pleas court proceedings or immediate ruling on a relator's complaint, IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed. 2 DRAFT |
|
|
NOW - CASE
LAW - All 50 States - Federal Courts - Try
it for FREE
We
now have full text legal news
drawn from all the major sources!!
Pennsylvania Lawyer Help Board
Find An Attorney
TERMS
OF USE - DISCLAIMER - LINKING POLICIES
Created and Developed by
Rominger Legal
Copyright 1997 - 2010.
A Division of
ROMINGER, INC.
