5/15/1996 Case Announcements - Ohio Supreme Court Opinion - Ohio Supreme Court Decision

	ROMINGER LEGAL
		Ohio Court Cases and Opinions - Ohio Legal Research
					Need Legal Help?
					Need Legal Help?
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER			LEGAL HEADLINES - CASE LAW - LEGAL FORMS	NOT FINDING WHAT YOU NEED? -RESEARCH

This court case was taken from the web sites of the Ohio Courts. Search our site for more cases - CLICK HERE

LEGAL RESEARCH

COURT REPORTERS

PRIVATE INVESTIGATORS

PROCESS SERVERS

DOCUMENT RETRIEVERS

EXPERT WITNESSES

Find a Private Investigator

Find an Expert Witness

Find a Process Server

Case Law - save on Lexis / WestLaw.

Legal News - Legal Headlines

SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

COLUMBUS

ANNOUNCEMENT

WEDNESDAY
May
15,
1996

MOTION DOCKET

94-2622.
State v. Otte.
Cuyahoga County, No. 64617. UPON CONSIDERATION of the motion filed by counsel
for appellant to stay the execution of sentence in the above-styled cause
pending the timely filing of a petition for a writ of certiorari in the Supreme
Court of the United States,

IT IS ORDERED that said motion be, and the same is hereby, granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the compliance with the mandate and the
execution of sentence be, and the same are hereby, stayed pending the timely
filing of the petition in the Supreme Court of the United States.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if such petition is timely filed, this stay
shall continue for an indefinite period pending final disposition of this cause
by the Supreme Court of the United States.

F.E. Sweeney and Cook, JJ., would grant the stay to a date certain.

Pfeifer J., would grant the stay to a date certain, one hundred eighty
days from today.

Stratton, J., would grant but reset.

MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS

96-961.
State ex rel. Russell v. Swain.
In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a
complaint for a writ of prohibition and was considered in a manner prescribed by
law. Upon consideration of relator's motion to expedite ruling of the issuance
of an alternative writ,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.

F.E. Sweeney, J., would deny an alternative writ.

Stratton, J., would grant the motion to expedite.

96-1109.
State ex rel. Youngstown City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Krichbaum.
In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a
complaint for a writ of prohibition and was considered in a manner prescribed by
law. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED
by the court that this cause be, and hereby is,
dismissed.

Cook, J., dissents and would wait for respondent's response.