8/4/1997 Case Announcements - Ohio Supreme Court Opinion - Ohio Supreme Court Decision

	ROMINGER LEGAL
		Ohio Court Cases and Opinions - Ohio Legal Research
					Need Legal Help?
					Need Legal Help?
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER			LEGAL HEADLINES - CASE LAW - LEGAL FORMS	NOT FINDING WHAT YOU NEED? -RESEARCH

This court case was taken from the web sites of the Ohio Courts. Search our site for more cases - CLICK HERE

LEGAL RESEARCH

COURT REPORTERS

PRIVATE INVESTIGATORS

PROCESS SERVERS

DOCUMENT RETRIEVERS

EXPERT WITNESSES

Find a Private Investigator

Find an Expert Witness

Find a Process Server

Case Law - save on Lexis / WestLaw.

Legal News - Legal Headlines

2
08/04/97

SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

COLUMBUS

ANNOUNCEMENT

MONDAY
August 4, 1997

MOTION DOCKET

97-865. Justice v. Cuyahoga Cty. Prosecutor.
In Prohibition. On June 18, 1997, this court filed an entry
treating respondents' answer as a motion to dismiss, sustaining
the motion, and dismissing this cause. On July 25, 1997, relator
filed a document titled "Motion for Reconsideration under Civil
Rule 60(B)" and "Relator Responds to Both Respondent[s'] Answers
Under Civil Rule 60(B) Reconsideration." It appears to this
court that relator's motion is, in substance, an untimely motion
for reconsideration of this court's decision of June 18, 1997,
under S.Ct.Prac.R. XI(2) and not a motion under Civ.R. 60(B).
Whereas S.Ct.Prac.R. XI(2)(C) prohibits the filing of an untimely
motion for reconsideration.
IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that relator's
motion for reconsideration be and hereby is stricken.

97-1362. Bourlas Constr., Inc. v. Karns.
Stark App. No. 1996CA00290. This cause is pending before the
court as a discretionary appeal from the Court of Appeals for
Stark County. Upon consideration of appellants' motion to stay
court of appeals' judgment pending appeal,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion to stay be, and
hereby is, denied.

MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS

97-877. State ex rel. Sinito v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth.
Franklin App. No. 96APD11-1572. This cause is pending before the
court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County.
Upon consideration of appellant's application for dismissal,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for
dismissal be, and hereby is, granted.
ACCORDINGLY, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this
cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.

97-968. State ex rel. Hare v. Indus. Comm.

Franklin App. No. 96APD06-811. This cause is pending before the
court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County.
It appears from the records of this court that appellant has not
filed a merit brief, due July 21, 1997, in compliance with the
Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed
to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon
consideration thereof,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby
is, dismissed sua sponte.

97-1055. Rea v. Pecsok, Rea & Demarchi.
Cuyahoga App. No. 71014. This cause is pending before the court
as a discretionary appeal. Upon consideration of appellants'
application for dismissal,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for
dismissal be, and hereby is, granted.
ACCORDINGLY, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this
cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.