5/8/1997 Case Announcements - Ohio Supreme Court Opinion - Ohio Supreme Court Decision

	ROMINGER LEGAL
		Ohio Court Cases and Opinions - Ohio Legal Research
					Need Legal Help?
					Need Legal Help?
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER			LEGAL HEADLINES - CASE LAW - LEGAL FORMS	NOT FINDING WHAT YOU NEED? -RESEARCH

This court case was taken from the web sites of the Ohio Courts. Search our site for more cases - CLICK HERE

LEGAL RESEARCH

COURT REPORTERS

PRIVATE INVESTIGATORS

PROCESS SERVERS

DOCUMENT RETRIEVERS

EXPERT WITNESSES

Find a Private Investigator

Find an Expert Witness

Find a Process Server

Case Law - save on Lexis / WestLaw.

Legal News - Legal Headlines

2
05/08/97

SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

COLUMBUS

ANNOUNCEMENT

THURSDAY
May 8, 1997

MOTION DOCKET

95-2279. Feichtner v. Ohio Dept. of Transp.
Franklin App. No. 95API01-47. On May 6, 1997, appellant filed a
document titled "Appellant's Request Pursuant to Rule XXII."
Appellant requests a waiver of the prohibition against filing a
reply to a memorandum opposing a motion found in S.Ct.Prac.R.
XIV(4)(B), in order to file a reply to appellee's memorandum
opposing appellant's motion for reconsideration. Whereas there
is no provision in S.Ct.Prac.R. XI permitting the filing of a
reply to a memorandum opposing a motion for reconsideration; and
whereas S.Ct.Prac.R. XXII is not applicable because appellant's
motion for reconsideration was not pending when S.Ct.Prac.R.
XIV(4)(B) became effective; and whereas S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(4)(B)
prohibits the filing of a reply to a memorandum opposing a
motion,
IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that appellant's
request pursuant to Rule XXII be, and hereby is, stricken.

97-833. State ex rel. Englewood v. Montgomery Cty. Bd. of
Commrs.
In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing
of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Upon consideration of
the motion for leave to intervene by Randolph Township and
village of Clayton, and motion for stay of proceedings,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motions be, and hereby
are, denied.
Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent in part because
they would grant the motion for leave to intervene.