Disciplinary Counsel v. Booher - Ohio Supreme Court Opinion - Ohio Supreme Court Decision

	ROMINGER LEGAL
		Ohio Court Cases and Opinions - Ohio Legal Research
					Need Legal Help?
					Need Legal Help?
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER			LEGAL HEADLINES - CASE LAW - LEGAL FORMS	NOT FINDING WHAT YOU NEED? -RESEARCH

This court case was taken from the web sites of the Ohio Courts. Search our site for more cases - CLICK HERE

LEGAL RESEARCH

COURT REPORTERS

PRIVATE INVESTIGATORS

PROCESS SERVERS

DOCUMENT RETRIEVERS

EXPERT WITNESSES

Find a Private Investigator

Find an Expert Witness

Find a Process Server

Case Law - save on Lexis / WestLaw.

Legal News - Legal Headlines

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL V. BOOHER.
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Booher (1997), ___ Ohio St.3d ___.]

(No. 95-2554 -- Submitted and decided July 9, 1997.)

ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT.

This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an
application for reinstatement by respondent Michael R. Booher, a.k.a.
Michael Robert Booher, Attorney Registration No. 0007694, last known
address in Middletown, Ohio.

The court coming now to consider its order of May 29, 1996, wherein
the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a
period of one year, finds that respondent has substantially complied with
that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED by this court that Michael R. Booher, a.k.a. Michael
Robert Booher, is hereby reinstated to the practice of law in the state of
Ohio.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified
copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that

publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that
respondent bear the costs of publication.

For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Booher (1996), 75 Ohio
St.3d 509, 664 N.E.2d 522.

MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and
LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.

2