In re Wolfrom - Ohio Supreme Court Opinion - Ohio Supreme Court Decision

	ROMINGER LEGAL
		Ohio Court Cases and Opinions - Ohio Legal Research
					Need Legal Help?
					Need Legal Help?
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER			LEGAL HEADLINES - CASE LAW - LEGAL FORMS	NOT FINDING WHAT YOU NEED? -RESEARCH

This court case was taken from the web sites of the Ohio Courts. Search our site for more cases - CLICK HERE

LEGAL RESEARCH

COURT REPORTERS

PRIVATE INVESTIGATORS

PROCESS SERVERS

DOCUMENT RETRIEVERS

EXPERT WITNESSES

Find a Private Investigator

Find an Expert Witness

Find a Process Server

Case Law - save on Lexis / WestLaw.

Legal News - Legal Headlines

IN RE WOLFROM.
[Cite as In re Wolfrom (1997), 79 Ohio St.3d 1234.]
(No. 97-1249 -- Submitted and decided August 28, 1997.)
ON MOTION FOR REINSTATEMENT.

On July 11, 1997, this court suspended respondent, Carl T. Wolfrom, a.k.a.
Carl Thompson Wolfrom, for an interim period pursuant to Gov.Bar R.
V(5)(A)(4). On July 15, 1997, respondent filed a motion for reinstatement. On
July 16, 1997, the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline
submitted an entry pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(D)(1)(c), stating that respondent
no longer was in default of the child support order previously submitted to the
court on June 19, 1997. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(D)(1),
respondent, Carl T. Wolfrom, a.k.a. Carl Thompson Wolfrom, Attorney
Registration No. 0019564, be reinstated to the practice of law.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the requirements
of this court's order dated July 11, 1997, requiring respondent to file with the
Clerk of this court and with Disciplinary Counsel an affidavit of compliance on or
before August 11, 1997, and to comply with Gov.Bar R. X(3)(G) be waived.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(D)(2),
reinstatement of respondent shall not terminate any disciplinary proceedings that
may be pending against respondent.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified
copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be
made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs
of publication.

For earlier case, see In re Wolfrom (1997), 79 Ohio St.3d 1224, 681 N.E.2d
1336.

MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and
LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.

2