Disciplinary Counsel v. Kraig - Ohio Supreme Court Opinion - Ohio Supreme Court Decision

	ROMINGER LEGAL
		Ohio Court Cases and Opinions - Ohio Legal Research
					Need Legal Help?
					Need Legal Help?
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER			LEGAL HEADLINES - CASE LAW - LEGAL FORMS	NOT FINDING WHAT YOU NEED? -RESEARCH

This court case was taken from the web sites of the Ohio Courts. Search our site for more cases - CLICK HERE

LEGAL RESEARCH

COURT REPORTERS

PRIVATE INVESTIGATORS

PROCESS SERVERS

DOCUMENT RETRIEVERS

EXPERT WITNESSES

Find a Private Investigator

Find an Expert Witness

Find a Process Server

Case Law - save on Lexis / WestLaw.

Legal News - Legal Headlines

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. KRAIG.
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Kraig (1998), ___ Ohio St.3d ___.]
(No. 97-1285 -- Submitted December 2, 1998 -- Decided December 16, 1998.)
ON PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT.

This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of a petition
for reinstatement by respondent, Jerry Bernarr Kraig. In accordance with Gov.Bar
R. V(10)(F), respondent's petition for reinstatement was referred to the Board of
Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline. The Board of Commissioners on
Grievances and Discipline filed its Final Report in this court on October 22, 1998,
recommending that Jerry Bernarr Kraig be reinstated to the practice of law in the
state of Ohio. No objections to said Final Report were filed.

The court now considers its order of March 4, 1998, indefinitely
suspending respondent, Jerry Bernarr Kraig, from the practice of law pursuant to
Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(2), with credit for time served under the interim suspension in
In re Kraig (1995), 73 Ohio St.3d 1443, 654 N.E.2d 980. On consideration thereof
and the Final Report of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the respondent, Jerry Bernarr Kraig,
Attorney Registration No. 0012813, last known address in Cleveland, Ohio, be,
and hereby is, reinstated to the practice of law in Ohio.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that respondent be taxed the
costs of these proceedings in the amount of $707.65, less the deposit of $500, for a
total balance due of $207.65, which costs shall be payable to this court on or before
ninety days from the date of this order, by certified check or money order. It is
further ordered that if these costs are not paid in full on or before ninety days from
the date of this order, interest at the rate of ten percent per annum shall accrue as of
ninety days from the date of this order, on the balance of unpaid board costs. It is
further ordered that if costs are not paid in full on or before ninety days from the

date of this order, respondent may be found in contempt and may be suspended
until costs, including any accrued interest, are paid in full.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified
copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be
made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs
of publication.

For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Kraig (1998), 81 Ohio St.3d
187, 690 N.E.2d 2.

MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and
LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.

2