ROMINGER LEGAL
Ohio Court Cases and Opinions - Ohio Legal Research
Need Legal Help?
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER
LEGAL HEADLINES - CASE LAW - LEGAL FORMS
NOT FINDING WHAT YOU NEED? -RESEARCH
This court case was taken from the web sites of the Ohio Courts. Search our site for more cases - CLICK HERE

LEGAL RESEARCH
COURT REPORTERS
PRIVATE INVESTIGATORS
PROCESS SERVERS
DOCUMENT RETRIEVERS
EXPERT WITNESSES

 

Find a Private Investigator

Find an Expert Witness

Find a Process Server

Case Law - save on Lexis / WestLaw.

 
Web Rominger Legal

Legal News - Legal Headlines

 

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. BOYKIN.
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Boykin (1998), ___ Ohio St.3d ___.]
Attorneys at law -- Misconduct -- Indefinite suspension -- Engaging in conduct
prejudicial to the administration of justice -- Engaging in conduct
adversely reflecting on fitness to practice law -- Neglect of an entrusted
legal matter -- Failing to preserve identity of funds and property of a client
-- Failing to promptly pay or deliver to client funds the client is entitled to
receive -- Failing to cooperate in disciplinary investigation.
(No. 97-2725 -- Submitted March 4, 1998 -- Decided June 10, 1998.)
ON CERTIFIED REPORT by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and
Discipline of the Supreme Court, No. 96-105.

On December 9, 1996, relator, Office of Disciplinary Counsel, filed a three-
count complaint charging that respondent, Leroy Reuben Boykin of Columbus,
Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0031378, accepted retainers from clients in early
1996, but failed to perform any work or return the retainers upon request. Relator
also charged that respondent did not cooperate in the investigations of the
grievances filed by these clients.

Although respondent was served with the complaint, he failed to file an
answer and relator moved for a default judgment. The matter was submitted to a
panel of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the
Supreme Court ("board"), which found that Ernest Bircher had retained
respondent for $1,500 to provide legal services. Respondent performed no legal
work for Bircher. When Bircher was neither able to contact respondent, who had
moved and left no forwarding address, nor able to recover the retainer, he filed a
grievance with relator. Respondent did not respond to relator's attempts to
investigate Bircher's grievance.


The panel also found that on April 1, 1996, Charles R. Thompson employed
respondent to recover Thompson's seized motor vehicle and gave him a partial
retainer of $200. Respondent performed no work for Thompson. When
Thompson was also unable to contact respondent or recover the retainer, he filed a
grievance with relator. Respondent also did not respond to relator's attempts to
investigate Thompson's grievance.

In addition, the panel found that on May 8, 1996, Dallas Dotson retained
respondent for $300 to obtain a laboratory report related to Dotson's criminal case.
Respondent performed no work for Dotson. When Dotson was also unable to
contact respondent or recover the retainer, he filed a grievance with relator.
Respondent did not cooperate with relator's attempts to investigate Dotson's
grievance.

The panel concluded that by his conduct respondent violated DR 1-
102(A)(5) (engaging in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice), 1-
102(A)(6) (engaging in conduct that adversely reflects upon the attorney's fitness
to practice law), 6-101(A)(3) (neglecting an entrusted legal matter), 9-102(A)(2)
(failing to preserve the identity of the funds and property of a client), 9-102(B)(4)
(failing to promptly pay to the client, when requested, funds of the client in the
possession of the lawyer), and Gov.Bar R. V(4)(G) (failing to cooperate in a
disciplinary investigation). The panel recommended that the respondent be
indefinitely suspended from the practice of law. The board adopted the findings,
conclusions, and recommendation of the panel.
__________________

Jonathan E. Coughlan, Disciplinary Counsel, and Sally Ann Steuk, Assistant
Disciplinary Counsel, for relator.
__________________

2

Per
Curiam. We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of
the board. We also note that in August 1994, we suspended respondent for
eighteen months, but stayed the suspension on the condition, among others, that he
spend the entire time on probation under the guidance of a monitor. Disciplinary
Counsel v. Boykin (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 75, 637 N.E.2d 296.

Respondent is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in
Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.

MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and
LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.

3

 

Ask a Lawyer

 

 

FREE CASE REVIEW BY A LOCAL LAWYER!
|
|
\/

Personal Injury Law
Accidents
Dog Bite
Legal Malpractice
Medical Malpractice
Other Professional Malpractice
Libel & Slander
Product Liability
Slip & Fall
Torts
Workplace Injury
Wrongful Death
Auto Accidents
Motorcycle Accidents
Bankruptcy
Chapter 7
Chapter 11
Business/Corporate Law
Business Formation
Business Planning
Franchising
Tax Planning
Traffic/Transportation Law
Moving Violations
Routine Infractions
Lemon Law
Manufacturer Defects
Securities Law
Securities Litigation
Shareholder Disputes
Insider Trading
Foreign Investment
Wills & Estates

Wills

Trusts
Estate Planning
Family Law
Adoption
Child Abuse
Child Custody
Child Support
Divorce - Contested
Divorce - Uncontested
Juvenile Criminal Law
Premarital Agreements
Spousal Support
Labor/Employment Law
Wrongful Termination
Sexual Harassment
Age Discrimination
Workers Compensation
Real Estate/Property Law
Condemnation / Eminent Domain
Broker Litigation
Title Litigation
Landlord/Tenant
Buying/Selling/Leasing
Foreclosures
Residential Real Estate Litigation
Commercial Real Estate Litigation
Construction Litigation
Banking/Finance Law
Debtor/Creditor
Consumer Protection
Venture Capital
Constitutional Law
Discrimination
Police Misconduct
Sexual Harassment
Privacy Rights
Criminal Law
DUI / DWI / DOI
Assault & Battery
White Collar Crimes
Sex Crimes
Homocide Defense
Civil Law
Insurance Bad Faith
Civil Rights
Contracts
Estate Planning, Wills & Trusts
Litigation/Trials
Social Security
Worker's Compensation
Probate, Will & Trusts
Intellectual Property
Patents
Trademarks
Copyrights
Tax Law
IRS Disputes
Filing/Compliance
Tax Planning
Tax Power of Attorney
Health Care Law
Disability
Elder Law
Government/Specialty Law
Immigration
Education
Trade Law
Agricultural/Environmental
IRS Issues

 


Google
Search Rominger Legal


 


LEGAL HELP FORUM - Potential Client ? Post your question.
LEGAL HELP FORUM - Attorney? Answer Questions, Maybe get hired!

NOW - CASE LAW - All 50 States - Federal Courts - Try it for FREE


 


Get Legal News
Enter your Email


Preview

We now have full text legal news
drawn from all the major sources!!

ADD A SEARCH ENGINE TO YOUR PAGE!!!

TELL A FRIEND ABOUT ROMINGER LEGAL

Ask Your Legal Question Now.

Pennsylvania Lawyer Help Board

Find An Attorney

TERMS OF USE - DISCLAIMER - LINKING POLICIES

Created and Developed by
Rominger Legal
Copyright 1997 - 2010.

A Division of
ROMINGER, INC.