9/9/1998 Case Announcements - Ohio Supreme Court Opinion - Ohio Supreme Court Decision

	ROMINGER LEGAL
		Ohio Court Cases and Opinions - Ohio Legal Research
					Need Legal Help?
					Need Legal Help?
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER			LEGAL HEADLINES - CASE LAW - LEGAL FORMS	NOT FINDING WHAT YOU NEED? -RESEARCH

This court case was taken from the web sites of the Ohio Courts. Search our site for more cases - CLICK HERE

LEGAL RESEARCH

COURT REPORTERS

PRIVATE INVESTIGATORS

PROCESS SERVERS

DOCUMENT RETRIEVERS

EXPERT WITNESSES

Find a Private Investigator

Find an Expert Witness

Find a Process Server

Case Law - save on Lexis / WestLaw.

Legal News - Legal Headlines

2
09/09/98

SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

COLUMBUS

ANNOUNCEMENT

WEDNESDAY
September 9, 1998

MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS

98-1077. GeCep Corp. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision.
Board of Tax Appeals, Nos. 96-S-438 and 96-S-439. This cause is
pending as an appeal from the Board of Tax Appeals. Upon
consideration of the joint motion for remand to the Board of Tax
Appeals for the purpose of entering a stipulation and order
reflecting the parties' settlement of this cause pursuant to
this court's Pilot Mediation Program,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for remand be,
and hereby is, granted, and this cause is remanded to the Board
of Tax Appeals.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and
hereby is, dismissed.

98-1684. State ex rel. Manos v. Speese.
In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing
of a complaint for a writ of mandamus regarding an expedited
election matter. It appears from the records of this court that
relators have not filed evidence and a brief, due August 27,
1998, in compliance with S.Ct.Prac.R. X(9) and therefore have
failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence.
Upon consideration thereof,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby
is, dismissed with prejudice, sua sponte. See State ex rel.
SuperAmerica Group v. Licking Cty. Bd. of Elections (1997), 80
Ohio St.3d 182, 685 N.E.2d 507.

RECONSIDERATION DOCKET

98-1077. GeCep Corp. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision.
Board of Tax Appeals, Nos. 96-S-438 and 96-S-439. Reported at
83 Ohio St.3d 1405, ___ N.E.2d ___. This cause came on for
further consideration upon appellant's motion for
reconsideration. Upon consideration thereof,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for
reconsideration be, and hereby is, granted, and the appeal is
reinstated for the limited purpose of considering the parties'