|
ROMINGER
LEGAL
|
||||||||||
|
Ohio Court Cases and Opinions -
Ohio Legal Research
|
||||||||||
| Need Legal Help? | ||||||||||
|
NOT
FINDING WHAT YOU NEED? -RESEARCH
|
||||||||||
This
court case was taken from the web sites of the Ohio Courts. Search
our site for more cases - CLICK
HERE |
|
|
Case Law - save on Lexis / WestLaw. 2 04/27/98 SUPREME COURT OF OHIO COLUMBUS ANNOUNCEMENT MONDAY April 27, 1998 MERIT DOCKET 98-762. State ex rel. Hunt Sports Ent. v. Franklin Cty. Court of Common Pleas. In Mandamus and Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for writs of mandamus and prohibition. Upon consideration of relators' motion for issuance of alternative writ and emergency motion for stay, and the motion for leave to intervene by John H. McConnell and Wolfe Enterprises, Inc., IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed. Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS 98-353. State ex rel. Wynn v. McFaul. Cuyahoga App. No. 73738. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County. It appears from the records of this court that appellant has not filed a merit brief, due April 20, 1998, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed sua sponte. 98-447. State ex rel. Thomas v. Ghee. Richland App. No. 97CA110. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Richland County. It appears from the records of this court that appellant has not filed a merit brief, due April 21, 1998, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed sua sponte. 98-465. State v. Untied. Muskingum App. No. 960058. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and a claimed appeal of right. It appears from the records of this court that appellant has not filed a memorandum in support of jurisdiction, due April 20, 1998, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed sua sponte. |
|
|
NOW - CASE
LAW - All 50 States - Federal Courts - Try
it for FREE
We
now have full text legal news
drawn from all the major sources!!
Pennsylvania Lawyer Help Board
Find An Attorney
TERMS
OF USE - DISCLAIMER - LINKING POLICIES
Created and Developed by
Rominger Legal
Copyright 1997 - 2010.
A Division of
ROMINGER, INC.