1/5/1999 Case Announcements - Ohio Supreme Court Opinion - Ohio Supreme Court Decision

	ROMINGER LEGAL
		Ohio Court Cases and Opinions - Ohio Legal Research
					Need Legal Help?
					Need Legal Help?
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER			LEGAL HEADLINES - CASE LAW - LEGAL FORMS	NOT FINDING WHAT YOU NEED? -RESEARCH

This court case was taken from the web sites of the Ohio Courts. Search our site for more cases - CLICK HERE

LEGAL RESEARCH

COURT REPORTERS

PRIVATE INVESTIGATORS

PROCESS SERVERS

DOCUMENT RETRIEVERS

EXPERT WITNESSES

Find a Private Investigator

Find an Expert Witness

Find a Process Server

Case Law - save on Lexis / WestLaw.

Legal News - Legal Headlines

SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

COLUMBUS

ANNOUNCEMENT

TUESDAY

January 5, 1999

DISCIPLINARY DOCKET

89-1101. Disciplinary Counsel v. Morford.
On petition for reinstatement. Petition granted on the conditions recommended by
the board.

98-1055. In re Hartsel.
On November 9, 1998, movant, Disciplinary Counsel, filed a motion for this court
to issue an order requiring respondent, Norman Clyde Hartsel, to appear and show
cause why respondent should not be held in contempt for failure to obey the
court's June 18, 1998 order suspending him from the practice of law on an interim
basis upon conviction of a felony. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by this court that the motion be, and is hereby granted to
the extent that respondent show cause by filing a written response with the Clerk
of this court on or before twenty days from the date of this order why he should
not be found in contempt.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, sua sponte, that all documents filed with this
court in this case shall meet the filing requirements set forth in the Rules of
Practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio, including requirements as to form,
number, and timeliness of filings.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, sua sponte, that service shall be deemed
made on respondent by sending this order, and all other orders in this case, by
certified mail to the most recent address respondent has given to the Attorney
Registration Office.

98-1815. Disciplinary Counsel v. Simakis.
On September 2, 1998, movant, Disciplinary Counsel, filed an amended motion
for an order to appear and show cause, requesting the court to issue an order
requiring respondent to appear and show cause why he should not be held in
contempt for failing to obey this court's order of suspension dated July 2, 1998.
On October 29, 1998, the court granted the motion to the extent that respondent
was ordered to show cause by filing a written response why he should not be
found in contempt. Respondent did not respond to the order. Upon consideration
thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that respondent George
Konstantine Simakis appear in person before this court on Tuesday, February 9,
1999, at 9:00 a.m.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified
copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1).
2
1/5/99