1/28/1999 Case Announcements - Ohio Supreme Court Opinion - Ohio Supreme Court Decision

	ROMINGER LEGAL
		Ohio Court Cases and Opinions - Ohio Legal Research
					Need Legal Help?
					Need Legal Help?
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER			LEGAL HEADLINES - CASE LAW - LEGAL FORMS	NOT FINDING WHAT YOU NEED? -RESEARCH

This court case was taken from the web sites of the Ohio Courts. Search our site for more cases - CLICK HERE

LEGAL RESEARCH

COURT REPORTERS

PRIVATE INVESTIGATORS

PROCESS SERVERS

DOCUMENT RETRIEVERS

EXPERT WITNESSES

Find a Private Investigator

Find an Expert Witness

Find a Process Server

Case Law - save on Lexis / WestLaw.

Legal News - Legal Headlines

SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

COLUMBUS

ANNOUNCEMENT

THURSDAY

January 28, 1999

DISCIPLINARY DOCKET

98-1302. Disciplinary Counsel v. Sweeney.
Upon consideration of respondent's motion for leave to file additional factual
information,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for leave to file additional
factual information be, and hereby is, denied.

Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS

98-2362. State ex rel. Viceroy v. Fuerst.
Cuyahoga App. No. 75078. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal
from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County. It appears from the records of
this court that appellant has not filed a merit brief, due January 19, 1999, in
compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has
failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration
thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed
sua sponte.

98-2461. State ex rel. McCuller v. Callahan.
Cuyahoga App. No. 71961. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal
from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County. It appears from the records of
this court that appellant has not filed a merit brief, due January 19, 1999, in
compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has
failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration
thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed
sua sponte.

98-2480. State ex rel. Hannah v. Leonard.
Allen App. No. 19-85-5. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from
the Court of Appeals for Allen County. It appears from the records of this court
that appellant has not filed a merit brief, due January 19, 1999, in compliance with
the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute
this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed
sua sponte.

2
01/28/99