2/5/1999 Case Announcements - Ohio Supreme Court Opinion - Ohio Supreme Court Decision

	ROMINGER LEGAL
		Ohio Court Cases and Opinions - Ohio Legal Research
					Need Legal Help?
					Need Legal Help?
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER			LEGAL HEADLINES - CASE LAW - LEGAL FORMS	NOT FINDING WHAT YOU NEED? -RESEARCH

This court case was taken from the web sites of the Ohio Courts. Search our site for more cases - CLICK HERE

LEGAL RESEARCH

COURT REPORTERS

PRIVATE INVESTIGATORS

PROCESS SERVERS

DOCUMENT RETRIEVERS

EXPERT WITNESSES

Find a Private Investigator

Find an Expert Witness

Find a Process Server

Case Law - save on Lexis / WestLaw.

Legal News - Legal Headlines

SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

COLUMBUS

ANNOUNCEMENT

FRIDAY

February 5, 1999

MOTION DOCKET

98-749. Kopich v. Kopich.
Hamilton App. No. C-970175. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal
from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County. Upon consideration of the joint
motion for continuance of oral argument currently scheduled for February 10,
1999,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion to continue oral argument be,
and hereby is, granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that oral argument will be
rescheduled for April 13, 1999, and no further continuances will be allowed.

98-2549. State ex rel. Lucas Cty. Bd. of Commrs. v. Ohio Environmental
Protection Agency.
In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a
writ of mandamus. Upon consideration of the motion for leave to intervene of
Envirosafe Services of Ohio, Inc.,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for leave to intervene be, and
hereby is, granted.

DISCIPLINARY DOCKET

97-2647. Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Shafran.
On December 8, 1998, counsel for respondent filed a motion to withdraw as
counsel. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion to withdraw as counsel be,
and is, hereby, granted.

98-1815. Disciplinary Counsel v. Simakis.
On September 2, 1998, movant, Disciplinary Counsel, filed an amended motion
for order to appear and show cause. On October 29, 1998, this court granted the
motion to the extent that respondent was ordered to reply within twenty days why
he should not be found in contempt for failure to comply with the court's
suspension order. Respondent did not respond and on January 5, 1999, this court
ordered respondent to appear before this court on February 9, 1999. On January
11, 1999, movant filed a motion to vacate the January 5, 1999 order of the court.
Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion to vacate the January 5, 1999
order be, and is, hereby, granted, and that the January 5, 1999 order of this court
be, and is, hereby, vacated, and that respondent is not required to appear before
this court on February 9, 1999.

Cook, J., dissents.

2
02/05/99