2/10/1999 Case Announcements - Ohio Supreme Court Opinion - Ohio Supreme Court Decision

	ROMINGER LEGAL
		Ohio Court Cases and Opinions - Ohio Legal Research
					Need Legal Help?
					Need Legal Help?
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER			LEGAL HEADLINES - CASE LAW - LEGAL FORMS	NOT FINDING WHAT YOU NEED? -RESEARCH

This court case was taken from the web sites of the Ohio Courts. Search our site for more cases - CLICK HERE

LEGAL RESEARCH

COURT REPORTERS

PRIVATE INVESTIGATORS

PROCESS SERVERS

DOCUMENT RETRIEVERS

EXPERT WITNESSES

Find a Private Investigator

Find an Expert Witness

Find a Process Server

Case Law - save on Lexis / WestLaw.

Legal News - Legal Headlines

SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

COLUMBUS

ANNOUNCEMENT

WEDNESDAY

February 10, 1999

MOTION DOCKET

98-207. Tanzi v. Nahigian.
Cuyahoga App. No. 71872. This cause is pending before the court as a
discretionary appeal. On March 2, 1998, this court granted appellant's motion for
stay on the ground that Judge Michael Watson of the Franklin County Court of
Common Pleas stayed all actions pending against insureds of PIE Mutual
Insurance Company. On June 11, 1998, appellant filed a notice that Judge Watson
had ordered that the stay remain in effect until September 23, 1998. It appearing
to the court that the stay granted by Judge Watson has expired,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the stay granted by this court
be, and hereby is, lifted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that appellees may
file a memorandum in response within thirty days of the date of this entry.

98-497. State v. Pilgrim.
Pickaway App. Nos. 97CA2 and 97CA4. This cause is pending before the court as
a discretionary appeal. On March 11, 1998, appellant filed a notice of a motion to
certify a conflict pending in the Court of Appeals for Pickaway County. Pursuant
to S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(A), this court stayed consideration of the jurisdictional
memoranda in this appeal until the court of appeals determined whether to certify
a conflict. Whereas a copy of a court of appeals' order certifying a conflict has not
been filed pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(1), and the appellant has not filed a notice

that the court of appeals determined that a conflict does not exist pursuant to
S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(B),

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that appellant show cause within
ten days of the date of this order why this court should not proceed to consider the
jurisdictional memoranda in this appeal pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. III.

MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS

98-1519. Sharwell v. Wimberly.
Cuyahoga App. No. 73299. This cause is pending before the court as a
discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right. It appears from the records of
this court that appellant has not filed a memorandum in support of jurisdiction,
due August 10, 1998, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme
Court and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence.
Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed
sua sponte.
2
02/10/99