State ex rel. McCuller v. Ghee - Ohio Supreme Court Opinion - Ohio Supreme Court Decision

	ROMINGER LEGAL
		Ohio Court Cases and Opinions - Ohio Legal Research
					Need Legal Help?
					Need Legal Help?
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER			LEGAL HEADLINES - CASE LAW - LEGAL FORMS	NOT FINDING WHAT YOU NEED? -RESEARCH

This court case was taken from the web sites of the Ohio Courts. Search our site for more cases - CLICK HERE

LEGAL RESEARCH

COURT REPORTERS

PRIVATE INVESTIGATORS

PROCESS SERVERS

DOCUMENT RETRIEVERS

EXPERT WITNESSES

Find a Private Investigator

Find an Expert Witness

Find a Process Server

Case Law - save on Lexis / WestLaw.

Legal News - Legal Headlines

[Cite as State ex rel. McCuller v. Ghee, 87 Ohio St.3d 580, 2000-Ohio-249.]

THE STATE EX REL. MCCULLER, APPELLANT, v. GHEE, CHAIRPERSON, APPELLEE.
[Cite as State ex rel. McCuller v. Ghee (2000), 87 Ohio St.3d 580.]
Parole -- Revocation -- Mandamus to compel Ohio Adult Parole Authority
Chairperson to provide relator with an earlier parole hearing than one
continued until year 2001 -- Denial of writ affirmed.
(No. 99-1359 -- Submitted November 16, 1999 -- Decided January 26, 2000.)
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Madison County, No. CA99-02-005.

In 1980, the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas convicted appellant,
Charles D. McCuller, of two counts of rape, one count of attempted rape, and one
count of felonious assault, and sentenced him to prison. McCuller was paroled on
four separate occasions, the latest being May 1995. In July 1995, McCuller was
arrested, and he was subsequently found to have violated his parole conditions. In
October 1998, following a parole hearing, the parole board continued McCuller's
next parole hearing until the year 2001. The parole board found that release was
inappropriate, in part due to McCuller's four separate violations of his prison's
disciplinary conduct rules since his 1995 arrest.

In February 1999, McCuller filed a complaint in the Court of Appeals for
Madison County for a writ of mandamus to compel appellee, Ohio Adult Parole
Authority ("APA") Chairperson Margarette T. Ghee, to provide an earlier parole

hearing. McCuller claimed that the Parole Board's decision to continue his next
parole hearing until 2001 violated the APA's internal guidelines and constituted
vindictive retaliation for his filing of a separate mandamus action in 1997
challenging the constitutionality of his last parole revocation hearing. The court of
appeals granted Ghee's motion for summary judgment and denied the writ.

This cause is now before the court upon an appeal as of right.
__________________

Charles D. McCuller, pro se.

Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Jihad M. Smaili, Assistant
Attorney General, for appellee.
__________________

Per Curiam. McCuller asserts that the court of appeals erred in denying the
writ. For the following reasons, McCuller's contentions lack merit.

McCuller has no constitutional or statutory right to the earlier consideration
of parole. State ex rel. Henderson v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr. (1998), 81
Ohio St.3d 267, 268, 690 N.E.2d 887, 888. The APA's internal guidelines do not
alter the discretionary nature of its parole determination. State ex rel. Vaughn v.
Ohio Adult Parole Auth. (1999), 85 Ohio St.3d 378, 379, 708 N.E.2d 720, 721.

Moreover, as the court of appeals observed, the fact that McCuller had been
paroled on four previous occasions within a seven-year period did not support

2

McCuller's claim that he was being treated differently from other inmates. The
evidence establishes that the Parole Board did not act vindictively. Instead, the
Parole Board was justifiably concerned that McCuller was a risk to society because
of his history of four previous parole revocations and four violations of prison
disciplinary conduct rules since his last revocation. See Hattie v. Anderson (1994),
68 Ohio St.3d 232, 235, 626 N.E.2d 67, 70-71.

Based on the foregoing, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.
Judgment affirmed.

MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and
LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.

3