4/12/2000 Case Announcements - Ohio Supreme Court Opinion - Ohio Supreme Court Decision

	ROMINGER LEGAL
		Ohio Court Cases and Opinions - Ohio Legal Research
					Need Legal Help?
					Need Legal Help?
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER			LEGAL HEADLINES - CASE LAW - LEGAL FORMS	NOT FINDING WHAT YOU NEED? -RESEARCH

This court case was taken from the web sites of the Ohio Courts. Search our site for more cases - CLICK HERE

LEGAL RESEARCH

COURT REPORTERS

PRIVATE INVESTIGATORS

PROCESS SERVERS

DOCUMENT RETRIEVERS

EXPERT WITNESSES

Find a Private Investigator

Find an Expert Witness

Find a Process Server

Case Law - save on Lexis / WestLaw.

Legal News - Legal Headlines

SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

COLUMBUS

ANNOUNCEMENT

WEDNESDAY

April 12, 2000

MOTION DOCKET

89-70. State v. Montgomery.
Lucas App. No. L-86-395. On May 13, 1992, this court stayed the execution of
sentence in this cause pending exhaustion of state post-conviction remedies and
reinstated the stay of execution on September 6, 1996. Appellee has moved that
this court set a date for execution of sentence. It appearing to the court that this
court declined jurisdiction and dismissed the appeal in case No. 99-528, appellant's
post-conviction appeal, on June 16, 1999,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that a date for the execution of
sentence be set.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED by this court that said sentence be carried into
execution by the Warden of the Southern Ohio Correctional Facility or, in his
absence, by the Deputy Warden on Tuesday, the 11th day of July, 2000, in
accordance with the statutes so provided.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certified copy of this entry and a warrant
under the seal of this court be duly certified to the Warden of the Southern Ohio
Correctional Facility and that said Warden shall make due return thereof to the
Clerk of the Court of Common Pleas of Lucas County.

99-1855. State v. Moore.
Fairfield App. No. 99CA24. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal
from the Court of Appeals for Fairfield County. Upon consideration of the motion
of amicus curiae, Ohio Attorney General Betty D. Montgomery, to participate in
oral argument scheduled for May 23, 2000,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion of Ohio Attorney General
Betty D. Montgomery to participate in oral argument scheduled for May 23, 2000,
be, and hereby is, granted, and the amicus curiae shall share the time allotted to
appellee.

99-1960. State v. Moore.
Fairfield App. No. 99CA24. This cause is pending before the court on the
certification of a conflict by the Court of Appeals for Fairfield County. Upon
consideration of the motion of amicus curiae, Ohio Attorney General Betty D.
Montgomery, to participate in oral argument scheduled for May 23, 2000,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion of Ohio Attorney General
Betty D. Montgomery to participate in oral argument scheduled for May 23, 2000,
be, and hereby is, granted, and the amicus curiae shall share the time allotted to
appellee.

04/12/00
2