11/17/2000 Case Announcements - Ohio Supreme Court Opinion - Ohio Supreme Court Decision

	ROMINGER LEGAL
		Ohio Court Cases and Opinions - Ohio Legal Research
					Need Legal Help?
					Need Legal Help?
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER			LEGAL HEADLINES - CASE LAW - LEGAL FORMS	NOT FINDING WHAT YOU NEED? -RESEARCH

This court case was taken from the web sites of the Ohio Courts. Search our site for more cases - CLICK HERE

LEGAL RESEARCH

COURT REPORTERS

PRIVATE INVESTIGATORS

PROCESS SERVERS

DOCUMENT RETRIEVERS

EXPERT WITNESSES

Find a Private Investigator

Find an Expert Witness

Find a Process Server

Case Law - save on Lexis / WestLaw.

Legal News - Legal Headlines

SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

COLUMBUS

ANNOUNCEMENT

FRIDAY

November 17, 2000

MOTION DOCKET

00-1457. State ex rel. Commt. for Referendum of Ordinance No. 3543-00 v.
White.
In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a
writ of mandamus regarding an expedited election matter. Upon consideration of
relators' motion for protective order,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for protective order be, and
hereby is, denied, because the motion was filed after the action complained of had
occurred.

MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS

00-941. In re Howard.
Greene App. No. 98CA132. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal
from the Court of Appeals for Greene County. It appears from the records of this
court that appellant has not filed a merit brief, due November 13, 2000, in
compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has
failed to prosecute this case with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration
thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is dismissed,
sua sponte.

It is further ordered that the appellee recover from the appellant its costs
herein expended; and that a mandate be sent to the Court of Common Pleas for
Greene County to carry this judgment into execution; and that a copy of this entry
be certified to the Clerk of the Court of Appeals for Greene County for entry.

00-1679. Stop-26-Riverbend, Inc. v. Krichbaum.
Mahoning App. No. 00CA153. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal
from the Court of Appeals for Mahoning County. Upon consideration of
appellants' application for dismissal,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal be, and
hereby is, granted.

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause
be, and hereby is, dismissed.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the appellee recover from the appellants
his costs herein expended; and that a mandate be sent to the Court of Appeals for
Mahoning County to carry this judgment into execution; and that a copy of this
entry be certified to the Clerk of the Court of Appeals for Mahoning County for
entry.

00-1684. Hubbard v. Brooks.
Richland App. No. 00CA67. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal
from the Court of Appeals for Richland County. It appears from the records of this
court that appellant has not filed a merit brief, due November 13, 2000, in
compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has
failed to prosecute this case with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration
thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is dismissed,
sua sponte.

It is further ordered that the appellee recover from the appellant her costs
herein expended; and that a mandate be sent to the Court of Appeals for Richland
County to carry this judgment into execution; and that a copy of this entry be
certified to the Clerk of the Court of Appeals for Richland County for entry.

2
11/17/00