Holcomb v. State Farm Ins. Cos. - Ohio Supreme Court Opinion - Ohio Supreme Court Decision

	ROMINGER LEGAL
		Ohio Court Cases and Opinions - Ohio Legal Research
					Need Legal Help?
					Need Legal Help?
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER			LEGAL HEADLINES - CASE LAW - LEGAL FORMS	NOT FINDING WHAT YOU NEED? -RESEARCH

This court case was taken from the web sites of the Ohio Courts. Search our site for more cases - CLICK HERE

LEGAL RESEARCH

COURT REPORTERS

PRIVATE INVESTIGATORS

PROCESS SERVERS

DOCUMENT RETRIEVERS

EXPERT WITNESSES

Find a Private Investigator

Find an Expert Witness

Find a Process Server

Case Law - save on Lexis / WestLaw.

Legal News - Legal Headlines

[Cite as Holcomb v. State Farm Ins. Cos., 88 Ohio St.3d 537, 2000-Ohio-398.]

HOLCOMB, ADMR., ET AL., APPELLANTS AND CROSS-APPELLEES, v. STATE FARM
INSURANCE COMPANIES, APPELLEE AND CROSS-APPELLANT.
[Cite as Holcomb v. State Farm Ins. Cos. (2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 537.]
Automobile liability insurance -- Uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage -- Court of
appeals' judgment vacated and cause remanded to trial court.
(No. 99-342, 99-348 and 99-618 -- Submitted April 11, 2000 -- Decided May 24, 2000.)
APPEAL and CROSS-APPEAL from and CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Franklin
County, No. 98AP-353.
__________________

DeLibera, Lyons & Bibbo and Jeffrey R. Bibbo, for appellants and cross-appellees.

Gallagher, Bradigan, Gams, Pryor & Littrell, L.L.P., and James R. Gallagher, for
appellee and cross-appellant.

Elk & Elk Co., L.P.A., and Todd O. Rosenberg, urging reversal on behalf of
appellants for amicus curiae, Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers.
__________________

The judgment of the court of appeals is vacated, and the cause is remanded to the
trial court for further proceedings and consideration, where applicable, of the Supreme
Court's decisions in Wolfe v. Wolfe (2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 246, 725 N.E.2d 261, and
Moore v. State Auto. Mut. Ins. Co. (2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 27, 723 N.E.2d 97.

DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

DOUGLAS, J., concurs separately.

MOYER, C.J., COOK and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.
__________________

DOUGLAS, J., concurring. I concur for the reasons set forth in my concurrence in
Stickney v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. (2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 504, 727 N.E.2d 1286.
__________________

LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissenting. I respectfully dissent for the reasons
set forth in the dissenting opinions in Wolfe v. Wolfe (2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 246,
252-255, 725 N.E.2d 261, 267-269, and Moore v. State Auto. Mut. Ins. Co. (2000),
88 Ohio St.3d 27, 33-36, 723 N.E.2d 97, 103-105.

MOYER, C.J., and COOK, J., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion.

2