Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Fidler - Ohio Supreme Court Opinion - Ohio Supreme Court Decision

	ROMINGER LEGAL
		Ohio Court Cases and Opinions - Ohio Legal Research
					Need Legal Help?
					Need Legal Help?
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER			LEGAL HEADLINES - CASE LAW - LEGAL FORMS	NOT FINDING WHAT YOU NEED? -RESEARCH

This court case was taken from the web sites of the Ohio Courts. Search our site for more cases - CLICK HERE

LEGAL RESEARCH

COURT REPORTERS

PRIVATE INVESTIGATORS

PROCESS SERVERS

DOCUMENT RETRIEVERS

EXPERT WITNESSES

Find a Private Investigator

Find an Expert Witness

Find a Process Server

Case Law - save on Lexis / WestLaw.

Legal News - Legal Headlines

[Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Fidler, 90 Ohio St.3d 1206, 2000-Ohio-40.]

CINCINNATI BAR ASSOCIATION v. FIDLER.
[Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Fidler (2000), 90 Ohio St.3d 1206.]
(No. 97-2641 -- Submitted and decided September 8, 2000.)
ON APPLICATION FOR TERMINATION OF PROBATION.

On July 24, 2000, respondent filed an application for termination of
probation. The court finds that respondent has substantially complied with
Gov.Bar R. V(9)(D) and with its June 8, 1999 order.

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED by the court that the probation of Mark W.
Fidler, Attorney Registration No. 0020309, last known business address in
Cincinnati, Ohio, be, and hereby is, terminated.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, sua sponte, by the court, that within ninety
days of the date of this order, respondent shall reimburse any amounts that have
been awarded against the respondent by the Clients' Security Fund pursuant to
Gov.Bar R. VIII(7)(F). It is further ordered, sua sponte, by the court that if, after
the date of this order, the Clients' Security Fund awards any amount against the
respondent pursuant to Gov.Bar R. VIII(7)(F), the respondent shall reimburse that
amount to the Clients' Security Fund within ninety days of the notice of such
award.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified
copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be
made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs
of publication.

For earlier cases, see Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Fidler (1998), 83 Ohio St.3d
396, 700 N.E.2d 323, and Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Fidler (1999), 86 Ohio St.3d
1201, 711 N.E.2d 690.

MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and
LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.

2