Disciplinary Counsel v. Nichols - Ohio Supreme Court Opinion - Ohio Supreme Court Decision

	ROMINGER LEGAL
		Ohio Court Cases and Opinions - Ohio Legal Research
					Need Legal Help?
					Need Legal Help?
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER			LEGAL HEADLINES - CASE LAW - LEGAL FORMS	NOT FINDING WHAT YOU NEED? -RESEARCH

This court case was taken from the web sites of the Ohio Courts. Search our site for more cases - CLICK HERE

LEGAL RESEARCH

COURT REPORTERS

PRIVATE INVESTIGATORS

PROCESS SERVERS

DOCUMENT RETRIEVERS

EXPERT WITNESSES

Find a Private Investigator

Find an Expert Witness

Find a Process Server

Case Law - save on Lexis / WestLaw.

Legal News - Legal Headlines

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Nichols, 92 Ohio St.3d 1202, 2001-Ohio-106.]

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. NICHOLS.
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Nichols (2001), 92 Ohio St.3d 1202.]
(No. 92-1324 -- Submitted and decided May 17, 2001.)
ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT.
__________________

This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for
reinstatement by respondent LeRoy Alvin Nichols, Attorney Registration No. 0015743,
last known address in Columbus, Ohio.

The court now considers its order of March 17, 1993, wherein the court, pursuant
to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of six months, with the
suspension to follow respondent's disciplinary sanction entered in Supreme Court case
No. 90-1705, and further ordered that respondent's suspension be stayed on condition he
serve a third year of probation, to commence August 28, 1993. The court also considers
its orders of September 14, 1994, and November 17, 1994, wherein the court, pursuant to
Gov.Bar R. V(9), revoked respondent's probation and reinstated his six-month
suspension. The court finds that respondent has substantially complied with the
provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED by this court that LeRoy Alvin Nichols be, and hereby is,
reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of
this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided
for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

For earlier cases, see Columbus Bar Assn. v. Nichols (1990), 61 Ohio St.3d 546,
575 N.E.2d 799; Columbus Bar Assn. v. Nichols (1991), 62 Ohio St.3d 1486, 581 N.E.2d
1391; Columbus Bar Assn. v. Nichols (1992), 65 Ohio St.3d 1422, 598 N.E.2d 1172;
Disciplinary Counsel v. Nichols (1993), 66 Ohio St.3d 54, 607 N.E.2d 1068; Columbus

SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
Bar Assn. v. Nichols (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 1444, 639 N.E.2d 112; Columbus Bar Assn. v.
Nichols (1994), 71 Ohio St.3d 1410, 641 N.E.2d 1108; and Columbus Bar Assn. v.
Nichols (2001), 92 Ohio St.3d 1201, ___ N.E.2d ___.

MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and
LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.
__________________
2