Disciplinary Counsel v. Mazer - Ohio Supreme Court Opinion - Ohio Supreme Court Decision

	ROMINGER LEGAL
		Ohio Court Cases and Opinions - Ohio Legal Research
					Need Legal Help?
					Need Legal Help?
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER			LEGAL HEADLINES - CASE LAW - LEGAL FORMS	NOT FINDING WHAT YOU NEED? -RESEARCH

This court case was taken from the web sites of the Ohio Courts. Search our site for more cases - CLICK HERE

LEGAL RESEARCH

COURT REPORTERS

PRIVATE INVESTIGATORS

PROCESS SERVERS

DOCUMENT RETRIEVERS

EXPERT WITNESSES

Find a Private Investigator

Find an Expert Witness

Find a Process Server

Case Law - save on Lexis / WestLaw.

Legal News - Legal Headlines

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Mazer, 92 Ohio St.3d 1206, 2001-Ohio-127.]

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. MAZER.
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Mazer (2001), 92 Ohio St.3d 1206.]
(No. 96-985 -- Submitted May 16, 2001 -- Decided May 25, 2001.)
ON APPLICATION FOR TERMINATION OF PROBATION.
__________________

On June 14, 2000, respondent filed an application for termination of
probation. On December 6, 2000, respondent filed a motion to consider
termination of probation; on January 25, 2001, this court granted the motion and
ordered relator, Disciplinary Counsel, to show cause why it would not verify
respondent's compliance with the terms of probation; on February 8, 2001, relator
filed its response; and on March 30, 2001, respondent filed a reply to relator's
response. Upon consideration thereof, the court finds that respondent has
substantially complied with Gov.Bar R. V(9)(D), and with its order dated August
28, 1996, in which respondent was suspended for six months, with the suspension
stayed on condition and respondent be placed on probation for one year, or until
the condition was met, whichever was longer.

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED BY THE COURT that the probation of
respondent, Bernard D. Mazer, a.k.a. Bernard Duncan Mazer, Attorney
Registration No. 0037775, last known address in Dublin, Ohio, be, and hereby is,
terminated.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified
copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be
made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the
costs of publication.

For earlier cases, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Mazer (1996), 76 Ohio St.3d
481, 668 N.E.2d 478; Disciplinary Counsel v. Mazer (1999), 86 Ohio St.3d 185,

SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

712 N.E.2d 1246; and Disciplinary Counsel v. Mazer (2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 1470,
726 N.E.2d 1008.

DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur.

MOYER, C.J., and COOK, J., dissent.

LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., not participating.
__________________
2