Steinbach v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. - Ohio Supreme Court Opinion - Ohio Supreme Court Decision

	ROMINGER LEGAL
		Ohio Court Cases and Opinions - Ohio Legal Research
					Need Legal Help?
					Need Legal Help?
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER			LEGAL HEADLINES - CASE LAW - LEGAL FORMS	NOT FINDING WHAT YOU NEED? -RESEARCH

This court case was taken from the web sites of the Ohio Courts. Search our site for more cases - CLICK HERE

LEGAL RESEARCH

COURT REPORTERS

PRIVATE INVESTIGATORS

PROCESS SERVERS

DOCUMENT RETRIEVERS

EXPERT WITNESSES

Find a Private Investigator

Find an Expert Witness

Find a Process Server

Case Law - save on Lexis / WestLaw.

Legal News - Legal Headlines

[Cite as Steinbach v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 92 Ohio St.3d 210, 2001-
Ohio-169.]

STEINBACH ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE
INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE.
[Cite as Steinbach v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. (2001), 92 Ohio St.3d
210.]
Insurance -- Motor vehicles -- Mandatory offering of uninsured and
underinsured motorist coverage -- Amount available for payment for
purpose of setoff -- Court of appeals' judgment affirmed on authority of
Littrell v. Wigglesworth and Clark v. Scarpelli.
(No. 00-1224 -- Submitted May 16, 2001 -- Decided July 5, 2001.)
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Licking County, No. 99CA00064.
__________________

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of
Littrell v. Wigglesworth (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 425, 746 N.E.2d 1077, and Clark
v. Scarpelli (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 271, 744 N.E.2d 719.

DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur.

MOYER, C.J., COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur in judgment.
__________________

COOK, J., concurring in judgment. I concur in judgment based on the
reasoning set forth in my dissenting opinion in Littrell v. Wigglesworth (2001), 91
Ohio St.3d 425, 746 N.E.2d 1077, and in my opinion concurring in part and
dissenting in part in Clark v. Scarpelli (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 271, 744 N.E.2d
719.

MOYER, C.J., and LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., concur in the foregoing
opinion.
__________________

SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

Swedlow, Butler, Levine, Lewis & Dye Co., L.P.A., Jeffrey M. Lewis and
Brett Lieberman, for appellants.

Gallagher, Gams, Pryor, Tallan & Littrell, L.L.P., and James R.
Gallagher, for appellee.
__________________
2