04/23/2002 Case Announcements - Ohio Supreme Court Opinion - Ohio Supreme Court Decision

	ROMINGER LEGAL
		Ohio Court Cases and Opinions - Ohio Legal Research
					Need Legal Help?
					Need Legal Help?
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER			LEGAL HEADLINES - CASE LAW - LEGAL FORMS	NOT FINDING WHAT YOU NEED? -RESEARCH

This court case was taken from the web sites of the Ohio Courts. Search our site for more cases - CLICK HERE

LEGAL RESEARCH

COURT REPORTERS

PRIVATE INVESTIGATORS

PROCESS SERVERS

DOCUMENT RETRIEVERS

EXPERT WITNESSES

Find a Private Investigator

Find an Expert Witness

Find a Process Server

Case Law - save on Lexis / WestLaw.

Legal News - Legal Headlines

[Cite as 04/23/2002 Case Announcements, 2002-Ohio-1924.]
The Supreme Court of Ohio

CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS

April 23, 2002

MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS

2002-0632. State ex rel. Andrews v. Summit Cty. Court of Common Pleas.
In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a
writ of prohibition and was considered in a manner prescribed by law. Upon
consideration of relators' request for a determination before April 23, 2002,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton,
JJ., concur.

Douglas, J., would deny the motion to expedite and complaint in prohibition.

MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

1998-0904. State v. Herring.
Mahoning C.P. No. 96CR339. Upon consideration of the motion filed by counsel
for appellant to stay the execution of sentence in the above-styled cause pending
the timely filing of a petition for a writ of certiorari in the Supreme Court of the
United States and pending the exhaustion of state post-conviction remedies,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that said motion be, and the same is hereby,
granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that compliance with the mandate
and execution of sentence be, and hereby are, stayed pending the timely filing of
the petition in the Supreme Court of the United States.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if such petition is timely filed, this stay
shall continue for an indefinite period pending final disposition of this cause by the
Supreme Court of the United States.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this stay shall remain in
effect until exhaustion of all state post-conviction proceedings, including any
appeals.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel for the appellant and for the
appellee shall notify this court upon a final disposition by the Supreme Court of
the United States or when all proceedings for post-conviction relief before courts
of this state having been exhausted, whichever occurs later.

Cook, J., not participating.

1998-2360. State v. Twyford.
Jefferson App. No. 93J13. Upon consideration of the motion filed by counsel for
appellant to stay the execution of sentence in the above-styled cause pending the
timely filing of a petition for a writ of certiorari in the Supreme Court of the United
States and pending the exhaustion of state post-conviction remedies,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that said motion be, and the same is hereby,
granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that compliance with the mandate
and execution of sentence be, and hereby are, stayed pending the timely filing of
the petition in the Supreme Court of the United States.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if such petition is timely filed, this stay
shall continue for an indefinite period pending final disposition of this cause by the
Supreme Court of the United States.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this stay shall remain in
effect until exhaustion of all state post-conviction proceedings, including any
appeals.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel for the appellant and for the
appellee shall notify this court upon a final disposition by the Supreme Court of the
United States or when all proceedings for post-conviction relief before courts of
this state have been exhausted, whichever occurs later.
2
04-23-02