Columbus Bar Assn. v. Rieser - Ohio Supreme Court Opinion - Ohio Supreme Court Decision

	ROMINGER LEGAL
		Ohio Court Cases and Opinions - Ohio Legal Research
					Need Legal Help?
					Need Legal Help?
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER			LEGAL HEADLINES - CASE LAW - LEGAL FORMS	NOT FINDING WHAT YOU NEED? -RESEARCH

This court case was taken from the web sites of the Ohio Courts. Search our site for more cases - CLICK HERE

LEGAL RESEARCH

COURT REPORTERS

PRIVATE INVESTIGATORS

PROCESS SERVERS

DOCUMENT RETRIEVERS

EXPERT WITNESSES

Find a Private Investigator

Find an Expert Witness

Find a Process Server

Case Law - save on Lexis / WestLaw.

Legal News - Legal Headlines

[Cite as Columbus Bar Assn. v. Rieser, 95 Ohio St.3d 1211, 2002-Ohio-2004.]

COLUMBUS BAR ASSOCIATION v. RIESER.
[Cite as Columbus Bar Assn. v. Rieser , 95 Ohio St.3d 1211, 2002-Ohio-2004.]
(No. 2001-0411 -- Submitted and decided March 29, 2002.)
ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT.
__________________
{¶1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an
application for reinstatement by respondent David Paul Rieser, Attorney
Registration No. 0025247, last known business address in Columbus, Ohio.
{¶2} The court coming now to consider its order of August 15, 2001,
wherein pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), the court suspended respondent for
two years, with the final eighteen months to be stayed on conditions, finds that
respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of
Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore,
{¶3} IT IS ORDERED by the court that the final eighteen months of
respondent's suspension be stayed and that he be placed on probation for eighteen
months in accordance with Gov.Bar R. V(9) and consistent with the opinion
rendered herein on August 15, 2001.
{¶4} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that at the end of respondent's
probationary period, the relator file with the Clerk of this court a report indicating
whether respondent, during his probationary period, complied with the terms of
the probation.
{¶5} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that at the end of the probation
period, respondent may apply for termination of probation as provided in Gov.Bar
R. V(9). It is further ordered that respondent's probation shall not be terminated
until (1) respondent files an application for termination of probation in
compliance with Gov.Bar R. V(9)(D); (2) respondent complies with this and all

SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
other orders issued by this court; (3) respondent complies with the Rules for the
Government of the Bar of Ohio; (4) relator files with the Clerk of this court a
report indicating that respondent complied with the terms of the probation; and (5)
this court orders that the probation be terminated.
{¶6} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, sua sponte, by the court, that within
ninety days of the date of this order, respondent shall reimburse any amounts that
have been awarded against the respondent by the Clients' Security Fund pursuant
to Gov.Bar R. VIII(7)(F). It is further ordered, sua sponte, by the court that if,
after the date of this order, the Clients' Security Fund awards any amount against
the respondent pursuant to Gov.Bar R. VIII(7)(F), the respondent shall reimburse
that amount to the Clients' Security Fund within ninety days of the notice of such
award.
{¶7} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue
certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that
publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that
respondent bear the costs of publication.
{¶8} For other cases, see Columbus Bar Assn. v. Rieser (2001), 93 Ohio
St.3d 143, 753 N.E.2d 177; and Disciplinary Counsel v. Rieser (1995), 72 Ohio
St.3d 130, 647 N.E.2d 1366.

MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and
LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.
__________________
2