ROMINGER
LEGAL
Ohio Court Cases and Opinions -
Ohio Legal Research
NOT
FINDING WHAT YOU NEED? -RESEARCH
|
ROMINGER
LEGAL
|
||||||||||
|
Ohio Court Cases and Opinions -
Ohio Legal Research
|
||||||||||
| Need Legal Help? | ||||||||||
|
NOT
FINDING WHAT YOU NEED? -RESEARCH
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This
court case was taken from the web sites of the Ohio Courts. Search
our site for more cases - CLICK
HERE |
|
|
Case Law - save on Lexis / WestLaw. [Cite as 03/31/2003 Case Announcements, 2003-Ohio-1573.] The Supreme Court of Ohio CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS March 31, 2003 MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS 2003-0143. State ex rel. Wilson v. Lucas Cty. Common Pleas Court. In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Upon consideration of relator's motion to consolidate Supreme Court case Nos. 2003-0143, 2003-0144, 2003-0145, 2003-0146, 2003-0148, and 2003-0149, and respondents' motion to dismiss, IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion to consolidate be, and hereby is, denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that respondents' motion to dismiss be, and hereby is, sustained. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed. The court finds that relator, Kenneth Jay Wilson, has abused his indigency status under S.Ct.Prac.R. XV(3) by filing numerous frivolous original actions for extraordinary relief. Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the Clerk of this court shall not accept for filing any additional original actions under S.Ct.Prac.R. X from Kenneth Jay Wilson, unless accompanied by the docket fee and security deposit required by S.Ct.Prac.R. XV(1) and (2). Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook, Lundberg Stratton and O'Connor, JJ., concur. 2003-0144. State ex rel. Wilson v. Jepson. In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Upon consideration of relator's motion to consolidate Supreme Court case Nos. 2003-0143, 2003-0144, 2003-0145, 2003-0146, 2003-0148, and 2003-0149, and respondents' motion to dismiss, IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion to consolidate be, and hereby is, denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that respondents' motion to dismiss be, and hereby is, sustained. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed. The court finds that relator, Kenneth Jay Wilson, has abused his indigency status under S.Ct.Prac.R. XV(3) by filing numerous frivolous original actions for extraordinary relief. Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the Clerk of this court shall not accept for filing any additional original actions under S.Ct.Prac.R. X from Kenneth Jay Wilson, unless accompanied by the docket fee and security deposit required by S.Ct.Prac.R. XV(1) and (2). Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook, Lundberg Stratton and O'Connor, JJ., concur. 2003-0145. State ex rel. Wilson v. Goodman. In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Upon consideration of relator's motion to consolidate Supreme Court case Nos. 2003-0143, 2003-0144, 2003-0145, 2003-0146, 2003-0148, and 2003-0149, and respondents' motion to dismiss and respondent's motion for general order restricting respondent's pro se original actions in Ohio Supreme Court, IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion to consolidate be, and hereby is, denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that respondents' motion to dismiss be, and hereby is, sustained. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed. The court finds, sua sponte, that relator, Kenneth Jay Wilson, has abused his indigency status under S.Ct.Prac.R. XV(3) by filing numerous frivolous original actions for extraordinary relief. Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the Clerk of this court shall not accept for filing any additional original actions under S.Ct.Prac.R. X from Kenneth Jay Wilson, unless accompanied by the docket fee and security deposit required by S.Ct.Prac.R. XV(1) and (2). Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook, Lundberg Stratton and O'Connor, JJ., concur. 2 03-31-03 2003-0146. State ex rel. Wilson v. Wilkinson. In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Upon consideration of relator's motion for injunctive/declaratory judgment; relator's motion for restraining order; relator's motion to consolidate Supreme Court case Nos. 2003-0143, 2003-0144, 2003- 0145, 2003-0146, 2003-0148, and 2003-0149; and respondents' motions to dismiss, IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion to consolidate be, and hereby is, denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that respondents' motions to dismiss be, and hereby are, sustained. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed. The court finds that relator, Kenneth Jay Wilson, has abused his indigency status under S.Ct.Prac.R. XV(3) by filing numerous frivolous original actions for extraordinary relief. Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the Clerk of this court shall not accept for filing any additional original actions under S.Ct.Prac. R. X from Kenneth Jay Wilson, unless accompanied by the docket fee and security deposit required by S.Ct.Prac. R. XV(1) and (2). Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook, Lundberg Stratton and O'Connor, JJ., concur. 2003-0148. State ex rel. Wilson v. Toledo Mun. Court. In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Upon consideration of relator's motion to consolidate Supreme Court case Nos. 2003-0143, 2003-0144, 2003-0145, 2003-0146, 2003-0148, and 2003-0149, and respondents' motions to dismiss, IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion to consolidate be, and hereby is, denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that respondents' motions to dismiss be, and hereby are, sustained. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed. The court finds that relator, Kenneth Jay Wilson, has abused his indigency status under S.Ct.Prac.R. XV(3) by filing numerous frivolous original actions for extraordinary relief. Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the Clerk of this court shall not accept for filing any additional original actions under S.Ct.Prac. R. X from Kenneth Jay Wilson, unless accompanied by the docket fee and security deposit required by S.Ct.Prac. R. XV(1) and (2). 3 03-31-03 Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook, Lundberg Stratton and O'Connor, JJ., concur. 2003-0149. State ex rel. Wilson v. Scioto Cty. Common Pleas Court. In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Upon consideration of relator's motion to consolidate Supreme Court case Nos. 2003-0143, 2003-0144, 2003-0145, 2003-0146, and 2003-0148, IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion to consolidate be, and hereby is, denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed. The court finds that relator, Kenneth Jay Wilson, has abused his indigency status under S.Ct.Prac.R. XV(3) by filing numerous frivolous original actions for extraordinary relief. Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the Clerk of this court shall not accept for filing any additional original actions under S.Ct.Prac.R. X from Kenneth Jay Wilson, unless accompanied by the docket fee and security deposit required by S.Ct.Prac.R. XV(1) and (2). Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook, Lundberg Stratton and O'Connor, JJ., concur. 2003-0511. Epstein v. McFaul. In Habeas Corpus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus and was considered in a manner prescribed by law. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed. Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook, Lundberg Stratton and O'Connor, JJ., concur. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS 1998-1209. State v. Sanders. Hamilton App. No. C-960253. Upon consideration of appellant's motion for stay of execution, IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for stay be, and hereby is, granted. Cook, J., would grant for 90 days. 4 03-31-03 |
|
|
NOW - CASE
LAW - All 50 States - Federal Courts - Try
it for FREE
We
now have full text legal news
drawn from all the major sources!!
Pennsylvania Lawyer Help Board
Find An Attorney
TERMS
OF USE - DISCLAIMER - LINKING POLICIES
Created and Developed by
Rominger Legal
Copyright 1997 - 2010.
A Division of
ROMINGER, INC.
