04/07/2003 Case Announcements - Ohio Supreme Court Opinion - Ohio Supreme Court Decision

	ROMINGER LEGAL
		Ohio Court Cases and Opinions - Ohio Legal Research
					Need Legal Help?
					Need Legal Help?
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER			LEGAL HEADLINES - CASE LAW - LEGAL FORMS	NOT FINDING WHAT YOU NEED? -RESEARCH

This court case was taken from the web sites of the Ohio Courts. Search our site for more cases - CLICK HERE

LEGAL RESEARCH

COURT REPORTERS

PRIVATE INVESTIGATORS

PROCESS SERVERS

DOCUMENT RETRIEVERS

EXPERT WITNESSES

Find a Private Investigator

Find an Expert Witness

Find a Process Server

Case Law - save on Lexis / WestLaw.

Legal News - Legal Headlines

[Cite as 04/07/2003 Case Announcements, 2003-Ohio-1742.]
The Supreme Court of Ohio

CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS

April 7, 2003

MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

2003-0327. MARBEL Energy Corp. v. Zaino.
Board of Tax Appeals, Nos. 1998-G-302, 1998-G-303, and 1998-G-304. This
cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Board of Tax Appeals.
Upon consideration of appellant's motion for extension of time to file merit brief
pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(6)(C),

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for extension of time be, and
hereby is, granted, and appellant's merit brief is due on or before May 23, 2003.

2003-0517. State ex rel. Glenn v. Cunningham.
In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a
writ of mandamus regarding an expedited election matter. Upon consideration of
relator's motion for an extension of time,

IT IS ORDERED that relator's motion for an extension of time be, and
hereby is, granted, and that relator's memorandum in response to respondents'
motion to dismiss be due by April 14, 2003.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that because relator's
claim no longer involves the May 6, 2003 primary election, this case will no longer
be considered an expedited election matter under S.Ct.Prac.R. X(9), but will
proceed as a regular mandamus action under S.Ct.Prac.R. X(5).

MEDIATION REFERRALS

The following cases have been returned to the regular docket pursuant to
S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(6)(E):