01/23/2003 Case Announcements - Ohio Supreme Court Opinion - Ohio Supreme Court Decision

	ROMINGER LEGAL
		Ohio Court Cases and Opinions - Ohio Legal Research
					Need Legal Help?
					Need Legal Help?
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER			LEGAL HEADLINES - CASE LAW - LEGAL FORMS	NOT FINDING WHAT YOU NEED? -RESEARCH

This court case was taken from the web sites of the Ohio Courts. Search our site for more cases - CLICK HERE

LEGAL RESEARCH

COURT REPORTERS

PRIVATE INVESTIGATORS

PROCESS SERVERS

DOCUMENT RETRIEVERS

EXPERT WITNESSES

Find a Private Investigator

Find an Expert Witness

Find a Process Server

Case Law - save on Lexis / WestLaw.

Legal News - Legal Headlines

[Cite as 01/23/2003 Case Announcements, 2003-Ohio-253.]
The Supreme Court of Ohio

CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS

January 23, 2003

MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

2002-1245. Estate of Houser v. Motorists Ins. Co.
Auglaize App. No. 2-02-02, 2002-Ohio-2845. This cause is pending before the
court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Auglaize County. On January 10,
2003, appellees Hartford Insurance Company, Hartford Fire Insurance Company,
and Hartford Specialty Insurance Company filed a stipulated extension of time to
file their merit briefs. Whereas appellees have previously filed a stipulated
extension of time to file their merit briefs, and further stipulated extensions are not
permitted under S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(3),

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the stipulated extension of
time be, and hereby is, stricken.

2002-2032. State v. Brinkley.
Lucas C.P. No. CR002826. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal
from the Court of Common Pleas of Lucas County. Upon consideration of
appellant's motion for extension of time to transmit the record,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for extension of time to
transmit the record be, and hereby is, granted, and the time for transmitting the
record is extended to March 10, 2003.

DISCIPLINARY CASES

1998-2663. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Arnold.
On September 14, 2001, this court reinstated respondent and directed him to pay
board costs in the amount of $644.99 by December 13, 2001, plus interest at a
rate of 10 percent per annum to begin accruing 90 days from the date of the order.
On March 12, 2002, this court directed respondent to show cause why he should

not be found in contempt for failure to comply with the court's order. On March
27, 2002, respondent filed a response and upon consideration thereof, this court
ordered that respondent pay board costs in the amount of $644.99, including any
and all accrued interest, on or before November 1, 2002. The court's
reinstatement order of September 14, 2001, further ordered respondent to bear the
costs of publication as provided in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2). On June 21, 2002,
respondent was notified of publication costs in the amount of $137.45, plus
interest at a rate of 10 percent per annum to begin accruing 90 days from the date
of the notification. The court was notified that respondent died on July 5, 2002.

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the estate of respondent
pay outstanding board costs in the amount of $644.99, plus accrued interest, and
publication costs in the amount of $137.45, plus accrued interest.

2
01-23-03