|
ROMINGER
LEGAL
|
||||||||||
|
Ohio Court Cases and Opinions -
Ohio Legal Research
|
||||||||||
| Need Legal Help? | ||||||||||
|
NOT
FINDING WHAT YOU NEED? -RESEARCH
|
||||||||||
This
court case was taken from the web sites of the Ohio Courts. Search
our site for more cases - CLICK
HERE |
|
|
Case Law - save on Lexis / WestLaw. [Cite as 01/24/2003 Case Announcements, 2003-Ohio-273.] The Supreme Court of Ohio CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS January 24, 2003 MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS 1992-2019. State v. Fox. Wood App. No. 90-WD-067. By entry filed November 21, 2002, this court ordered that appellant's sentence be carried into execution on Wednesday, the 12th day of February, 2003. In order to facilitate this court's timely consideration of any matters relating to the execution of appellant's sentence, IT IS ORDERED by the court that the Chief Justice may suspend application of any provisions of the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court, including, but not limited to, the filing requirements imposed by S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(1). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that service of documents as required by S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(2) shall be personal or by facsimile transmission. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that counsel of record for the parties shall supply this court with a copy of any document relating to this matter that is filed in, or issued by, any other court in this state or any federal court, as well as any commutation, pardon, or warrant of reprieve issued by the Governor. A copy of the document shall be delivered to the Office of the Clerk as soon as possible, either personally or by facsimile transmission. 2002-1599. N. Coast Community Homes, Inc. v. Zaino. Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2001-J-1065. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Board of Tax Appeals. Upon consideration of appellant's motion for extension of time to file appellant's merit brief pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(6)(C), IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for extension of time be, and hereby is, granted, and appellant's merit brief is due on or before February 10, 2003. 2002-1841. State ex rel. Kroger Co. v. Robinette. Franklin App. No. 01AP-1319, 2002-Ohio-4777. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County. Upon consideration of appellant's motion for extension of time to file appellant's merit brief pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(6)(C), IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for extension of time be, and hereby is, granted, and appellant's merit brief is due on or before March 3, 2003. 2 01-24-03 |
|
|
NOW - CASE
LAW - All 50 States - Federal Courts - Try
it for FREE
We
now have full text legal news
drawn from all the major sources!!
Pennsylvania Lawyer Help Board
Find An Attorney
TERMS
OF USE - DISCLAIMER - LINKING POLICIES
Created and Developed by
Rominger Legal
Copyright 1997 - 2010.
A Division of
ROMINGER, INC.