01/31/2003 Case Announcements - Ohio Supreme Court Opinion - Ohio Supreme Court Decision

	ROMINGER LEGAL
		Ohio Court Cases and Opinions - Ohio Legal Research
					Need Legal Help?
					Need Legal Help?
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER			LEGAL HEADLINES - CASE LAW - LEGAL FORMS	NOT FINDING WHAT YOU NEED? -RESEARCH

This court case was taken from the web sites of the Ohio Courts. Search our site for more cases - CLICK HERE

LEGAL RESEARCH

COURT REPORTERS

PRIVATE INVESTIGATORS

PROCESS SERVERS

DOCUMENT RETRIEVERS

EXPERT WITNESSES

Find a Private Investigator

Find an Expert Witness

Find a Process Server

Case Law - save on Lexis / WestLaw.

Legal News - Legal Headlines

[Cite as 01/31/2003 Case Announcements, 2003-Ohio-411.]

The Supreme Court of Ohio

CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS

January 31, 2003

MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

2002-0227. Lehtinen v. Mervart.
Cuyahoga App. No. 79164. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal
from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County. Upon consideration of the
motion of amicus curiae, Ohio State Bar Association, for leave to participate in
oral argument scheduled for February 12, 2003,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for leave to participate in oral
argument be, and hereby is, granted, and the amicus curiae shall share the time
allotted to appellee.

2002-1196. Lane v. State Auto Ins. Cos.
Miami App. No. 2001-CA-59, 2002-Ohio-2698. This cause is pending before the
court as a discretionary appeal. On July 15, 2002, appellant filed a notice that a
motion to certify a conflict was pending in the court of appeals and, pursuant to
S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(A), this court stayed consideration of the jurisdictional
memoranda filed in this appeal. Whereas appellant has neither notified this court
that the court of appeals determined that a conflict does not exist as provided by
S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(B), nor filed a copy of the court of appeals' order certifying the
existence of a conflict as provided by S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(C),

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that appellant show cause within
20 days of this entry why this court should not proceed to consider the
jurisdictional memoranda in this appeal pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. III(6).