09/05/2003 Case Announcements - Ohio Supreme Court Opinion - Ohio Supreme Court Decision

	ROMINGER LEGAL
		Ohio Court Cases and Opinions - Ohio Legal Research
					Need Legal Help?
					Need Legal Help?
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER			LEGAL HEADLINES - CASE LAW - LEGAL FORMS	NOT FINDING WHAT YOU NEED? -RESEARCH

This court case was taken from the web sites of the Ohio Courts. Search our site for more cases - CLICK HERE

LEGAL RESEARCH

COURT REPORTERS

PRIVATE INVESTIGATORS

PROCESS SERVERS

DOCUMENT RETRIEVERS

EXPERT WITNESSES

Find a Private Investigator

Find an Expert Witness

Find a Process Server

Case Law - save on Lexis / WestLaw.

Legal News - Legal Headlines

[Cite as 09/05/2003 Case Announcements, 2003-Ohio-4677.]
The Supreme Court of Ohio

CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS

September 5, 2003

MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

2003-0829. State ex rel. Shandrow v. Roper Corp.
Franklin App. No. 02AP-342, 2003-Ohio-1516. This cause is pending before the
court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County. Upon
consideration of appellant's motion for extension of time to file merit brief
pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(6)(C),

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for extension of time be, and
hereby is, granted, and appellant's merit brief is due on or before September 30,
2003.

2003-1427. In re Ewanicky.
Cuyahoga App. No. 81742, 2003-Ohio-3351. This cause is pending before the
court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right. Upon consideration of
appellant's motion for stay of the orders and judgments of the probate court,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for stay be, and hereby is,
denied.

Pfeifer, J., would grant.

Lundberg Stratton, J., would grant and continue bond.

MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS

2003-1043. State v. Hibbard.
Butler App. Nos. CA2001-12-276 and CA2001-12-286, 2003-Ohio-707. This
cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal. It appears from the
records of this court that appellant has not filed a memorandum in support of
jurisdiction, due August 29, 2003, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the

Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute this case with the requisite
diligence. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed,
sua sponte.

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause
be, and hereby is, dismissed.

2003-1425. State v. Evans.
Jefferson App. No. 02 JE 11, 153 Ohio App.3d 226, 2003-Ohio-3475. This cause
is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and a claimed appeal of right.
Upon consideration of appellant's application for dismissal,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal be, and
hereby is, granted.

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause
be, and hereby is, dismissed.

2
09-05-03