Columbus Bar Assn. v. Farkas - Ohio Supreme Court Opinion - Ohio Supreme Court Decision

	ROMINGER LEGAL
		Ohio Court Cases and Opinions - Ohio Legal Research
					Need Legal Help?
					Need Legal Help?
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER			LEGAL HEADLINES - CASE LAW - LEGAL FORMS	NOT FINDING WHAT YOU NEED? -RESEARCH

This court case was taken from the web sites of the Ohio Courts. Search our site for more cases - CLICK HERE

LEGAL RESEARCH

COURT REPORTERS

PRIVATE INVESTIGATORS

PROCESS SERVERS

DOCUMENT RETRIEVERS

EXPERT WITNESSES

Find a Private Investigator

Find an Expert Witness

Find a Process Server

Case Law - save on Lexis / WestLaw.

Legal News - Legal Headlines

[Cite as Columbus Bar Assn. v. Farkas, 101 Ohio St.3d 1208, 2003-Ohio-7291.]

COLUMBUS BAR ASSOCIATION v. FARKAS.
[Cite as Columbus Bar Assn. v. Farkas, 101 Ohio St.3d 1208, 2003-Ohio-
7291.]
(No. 2001-1816 -- Submitted December 12, 2003 -- Decided December 26,
2003.)
ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT.
__________________
{¶1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an
application for reinstatement by respondent, Jeffrey W. Farkas, Attorney
Registration No. 0061547, last known business address in Columbus, Ohio.
{¶2} The court coming now to consider its order of March 6, 2002,
wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a
period of two years with the second year stayed and respondent placed on
probation for the second year, finds that respondent has substantially complied
with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore,
{¶3} IT IS ORDERED by the court that the final year of respondent's
suspension be stayed and that he be placed on probation for a period of one year
in accordance with Gov.Bar R. V(9) and consistent with the opinion rendered
herein on March 6, 2002. It is further ordered that respondent shall complete six
hours of approved continuing legal education dealing with law office procedures
as part of his general continuing legal education requirements under Gov.Bar R.
X.
{¶4} It is further ordered that on or before 30 days from the date of this
order, relator, Columbus Bar Association, file with the Clerk of this court the
name of the attorney who will serve as respondent's monitor, in accordance with

SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
Gov.Bar R. V(9), who will oversee respondent's practice and office procedures,
with periodic reports to be made to relator.
{¶5} It is further ordered that at the end of respondent's probationary
period, the relator file with the Clerk of this court a report indicating whether
respondent, during his probationary period, complied with the terms of the
probation.
{¶6} It is further ordered that on or after one year from the date of this
order, respondent may apply for termination of probation as provided in Gov.Bar
R. V(9). It is further ordered that respondent's probation shall not be terminated
and respondent shall not be reinstated to the practice of law until (1) respondent
files an application for termination of probation in compliance with Gov.Bar R.
V(9)(D); (2) respondent complies with this and all other orders issued by this
court; (3) respondent complies with the Rules for the Government of the Bar of
Ohio; (4) relator files with the Clerk of this court a report indicating that
respondent complied with the terms of the probation; and (5) this court orders that
the probation be terminated.
{¶7} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue
certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that
publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that
respondent bear the costs of publication.
{¶8} For earlier case, see Columbus Bar Assn. v. Farkas (2002), 94
Ohio St.3d 419, 763 N.E.2d 1158.

MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON,
O'CONNOR and O'DONNELL, JJ., concur.
__________________
2