02/20/2003 Case Announcements - Ohio Supreme Court Opinion - Ohio Supreme Court Decision

	ROMINGER LEGAL
		Ohio Court Cases and Opinions - Ohio Legal Research
					Need Legal Help?
					Need Legal Help?
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER			LEGAL HEADLINES - CASE LAW - LEGAL FORMS	NOT FINDING WHAT YOU NEED? -RESEARCH

This court case was taken from the web sites of the Ohio Courts. Search our site for more cases - CLICK HERE

LEGAL RESEARCH

COURT REPORTERS

PRIVATE INVESTIGATORS

PROCESS SERVERS

DOCUMENT RETRIEVERS

EXPERT WITNESSES

Find a Private Investigator

Find an Expert Witness

Find a Process Server

Case Law - save on Lexis / WestLaw.

Legal News - Legal Headlines

[Cite as 02/20/2003 Case Announcements, 2003-Ohio-734.]
The Supreme Court of Ohio

CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS

February 20, 2003

APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2002-1932. Wodrich v. Fed. Ins. Co.
Greene App. No. 02CA3, 2002-Ohio-5122.

Moyer, C.J., dissents, would allow on Proposition of Law No. I, and would
hold the cause for the decision in 2002-1433, Allen v. Johnson, Wayne App. Nos.
01CA0046 and 01CA0047, 2002-Ohio-3404.

Cook and O'Connor, JJ., dissent, would allow, and would hold the cause for
the decision in 2002-0577, Burkhart v. CNA Ins. Co., Stark App. No.
2001CA00265, 2002-Ohio-903.

2002-1938. Allied Erecting & Dismantling Co., Inc. v. Youngstown.
Mahoning App. No. 00CA225, 2002-Ohio-5179.

Moyer, C.J., Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

2002-1944. State v. McCarthy.
Belmont App. No. 01BA33, 2002-Ohio-5185.

Moyer, C.J., Cook and O'Connor, JJ., dissent, would allow, and would hold
the cause for the decision in 2002-0422 and 2002-0351, State v. Comer, Lucas
App. No. L-99-1296, 2002-Ohio-233.

MISCELLANEOUS ORDERS

In re Report of the Commission
on Continuing Legal Education

Amy Kendall Larson
(#0071735),
Respondent.

This matter originated in this court on the filing of a report by the
Commission on Continuing Legal Education ("commission") pursuant to Gov.Bar
R. X(6)(A)(1)(b) and (A)(2)(d). The commission recommended the imposition of
sanctions against certain attorneys, including the above-named respondent, for
failure to comply with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. X, Attorney Continuing Legal
Education, for the 2000-2001 reporting period.

On January 27, 2003, this court entered an order adopting the commission's
recommendation related to the 2000-2001 reporting period imposing a sanction fee
upon the respondent.

On January 29, 2003, the commission filed a motion to vacate, requesting
that the order of January 27, 2003, pertaining to the above-named respondent, be
vacated. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion to vacate be, and hereby is,
granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the order of January 27,
2003, pertaining to respondent, be hereby vacated and this cause be dismissed.

2