[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Gardner, 101 Ohio St.3d 1241, 2004-Ohio-1209.] DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. GARDNER. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Gardner, 101 Ohio St.3d 1241, 2004-Ohio- 1209.]
(No. 2002-1461 -- Submitted March 8, 2004 -- Decided March 11, 2004.)
ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT.
__________________ {¶1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an
application for reinstatement by respondent, Mark J. Gardner, Attorney
Registration No. 0061172, last known business address in Cleveland, Ohio. {¶2} The court coming now to consider its order of August 13, 2003,
wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a
period of six months, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that
order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore, {¶3} IT IS ORDERED by this court that respondent be and hereby is
reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio. {¶4} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue
certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that
publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that
respondent bear the costs of publication. {¶5} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Gardner, 99 Ohio
St.3d 416, 2003-Ohio-4048, 793 N.E.2d 425.