|
ROMINGER
LEGAL
|
||||||||||
|
Ohio Court Cases and Opinions -
Ohio Legal Research
|
||||||||||
| Need Legal Help? | ||||||||||
|
NOT
FINDING WHAT YOU NEED? -RESEARCH
|
||||||||||
This
court case was taken from the web sites of the Ohio Courts. Search
our site for more cases - CLICK
HERE |
|
|
Case Law - save on Lexis / WestLaw. [Cite as 03/22/2004 Case Announcements, 2004-Ohio-1326.] The Supreme Court of Ohio CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS March 22, 2004 MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS 2003-1161. State v. Crotts. Cuyahoga App. No. 81477, 2003-Ohio-2473. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County. IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that this cause be remanded to the court of appeals for appointment of new counsel and that new counsel be permitted to brief and argue this case. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that appointed counsel shall file a copy of the court of appeals' entry of appointment with the Clerk of this court. 2003-2119. State ex rel. Szabo v. Wiseman. In Mandamus. This cause came on for further consideration upon relator's motion to refuse for fraud. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion be, and hereby is, denied. 2003-2161. State ex rel. Johns Manville Internatl., Inc. v. Indus. Comm. Franklin App. No. 02AP-957, 2003-Ohio-5808. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County. Upon consideration of appellant's motion for extension of time to file merit brief pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(6)(C), IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for extension of time be, and hereby is, granted, and that appellant's merit brief is due on or before April 28, 2004. 2004-0465. State ex rel. Romes v. Horvath. In Prohibition and Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for writs of prohibition and mandamus. Upon consideration of relators' motion to expedite, IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion be, and hereby is, denied. DISCIPLINARY CASES 2003-1865. Disciplinary Counsel v. Young. Upon consideration of respondent's motion to supplement the record, IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion be, and hereby is, denied. 2004-0019. Disciplinary Counsel v. Kearns. On Certified Order of the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Illinois, No. 02 CH 76. John William Kearns, Attorney Registration No. 0040666, is publicly reprimanded. ---------- |
|
|
NOW - CASE
LAW - All 50 States - Federal Courts - Try
it for FREE
We
now have full text legal news
drawn from all the major sources!!
Pennsylvania Lawyer Help Board
TERMS
OF USE - DISCLAIMER - LINKING POLICIES
Created and Developed by
Rominger Legal
Copyright 1997 - 2009.
A Division of
ROMINGER, INC.