03/14/2005 Case Announcements - Ohio Supreme Court Opinion - Ohio Supreme Court Decision

	ROMINGER LEGAL
		Ohio Court Cases and Opinions - Ohio Legal Research
					Need Legal Help?
					Need Legal Help?
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER			LEGAL HEADLINES - CASE LAW - LEGAL FORMS	NOT FINDING WHAT YOU NEED? -RESEARCH

This court case was taken from the web sites of the Ohio Courts. Search our site for more cases - CLICK HERE

LEGAL RESEARCH

COURT REPORTERS

PRIVATE INVESTIGATORS

PROCESS SERVERS

DOCUMENT RETRIEVERS

EXPERT WITNESSES

Find a Private Investigator

Find an Expert Witness

Find a Process Server

Case Law - save on Lexis / WestLaw.

Legal News - Legal Headlines

CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS

March 14, 2005

[Cite as 03/14/2005 Case Announcements, 2005-Ohio-1038.]

MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

2005-0260. State ex rel. Florence v. Zitter.
In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a
writ of prohibition and was considered in a manner prescribed by law. Upon
consideration of respondent's motion to dismiss or, alternatively, motion for
summary judgment,
IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that an alternative writ be, and
hereby is, granted and the following briefing schedule is set for presentation of
evidence and filing of briefs pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. X:
The parties shall file any evidence they intend to present within 20 days of
the date of this entry; relator shall file her brief within 10 days after the filing of
evidence; respondent shall file her brief within 20 days after the filing of relator's
brief; and relator may file a reply brief within 5 days after the filing of
respondent's brief.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the motion to dismiss and
motion for summary judgment be, and hereby are, denied.

MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS

2004-1536. State ex rel. Harris v. Indus. Comm.
Franklin App. No. 03AP-992, 2004-Ohio-4225. This cause is pending before the
court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County. Upon
consideration of the joint application for dismissal,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal be, and
hereby is, granted.
ACCORDINGLY, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause
be, and hereby is, dismissed.

2004-2044. Clearfield Village Ltd. v. Fulton Cty. Bd. of Revision.
Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2003-J-874. This cause is pending before the court as
an appeal from the Board of Tax Appeals. Upon consideration of appellant's
application for dismissal,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal be, and
hereby is, granted.

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause
be, and hereby is, dismissed.

MEDIATION REFERRALS

The following case has been referred to mediation pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R.
XIV(6):

2005-0431. State ex rel. Edwards v. Am. Bldg. Maintenance Co.
Franklin App. No. 04AP-115, 2005-Ohio-357.

The following case has been returned to the regular docket pursuant to
S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(6)(E):

2005-0156. State ex rel. Dixon v. Airborne Express.
Franklin App. No. 04AP-155, 2004-Ohio-7195.

2
03-14-05