04/18/2005 Case Announcements - Ohio Supreme Court Opinion - Ohio Supreme Court Decision

	ROMINGER LEGAL
		Ohio Court Cases and Opinions - Ohio Legal Research
					Need Legal Help?
					Need Legal Help?
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER			LEGAL HEADLINES - CASE LAW - LEGAL FORMS	NOT FINDING WHAT YOU NEED? -RESEARCH

This court case was taken from the web sites of the Ohio Courts. Search our site for more cases - CLICK HERE

LEGAL RESEARCH

COURT REPORTERS

PRIVATE INVESTIGATORS

PROCESS SERVERS

DOCUMENT RETRIEVERS

EXPERT WITNESSES

Find a Private Investigator

Find an Expert Witness

Find a Process Server

Case Law - save on Lexis / WestLaw.

Legal News - Legal Headlines

CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS

April 18, 2005

[Cite as 04/18/2005 Case Announcements, 2005-Ohio-1782.]

DISCIPLINARY CASES

2004-1143. In re McCord.
This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing by respondent of a
motion for reinstatement. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion be, and hereby is, denied.

2004-1373. Columbus Bar Assn. v. Moushey.
IT IS ORDERED by this court, sua sponte, that Michael L. Moushey, Attorney
Registration No. 0033805, last known business address in Columbus, Ohio, is
found in contempt for failure to comply with this court's order of December 22,
2004, to wit: failure to surrender his Certificate of Admission and file an affidavit
of compliance on or before January 21, 2005.

2004-1410. Dayton Bar Assn. v. Engel.
IT IS ORDERED by this court, sua sponte, that Andrew M. Engel, Attorney
Registration No. 0047371, last known business address in Dayton, Ohio, is found
in contempt for failure to comply with this court's order of December 22, 2004, to
wit: failure to file an affidavit of compliance on or before January 21, 2005.

MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS

2004-0003. State v. Back.
Butler App. No. CA2003-01-011. This cause is pending before the court on the
certification of a conflict by the Court of Appeals for Butler County. Upon
consideration of appellant's application for dismissal,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal be, and
hereby is, granted.

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause
be, and hereby is, dismissed.

2004-2134. Becker v. Watson.
In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court upon the filing a complaint for a
writ of prohibition on December 27, 2004. On January 11, 2005, the Clerk of this
court notified relator of the failure of service on respondent pursuant to Civ.R.
4.1(A). To date, relator has failed to amend his complaint or otherwise instruct the
Clerk regarding completion of service under Civ.R. 4.6(E). Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that this cause be, and hereby is,
dismissed without prejudice.

2005-0023. Duke Realty Ohio v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Revision.
Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2003-T-1751. This cause is pending before the court as
an appeal from the Board of Tax Appeals. Upon consideration of appellant's
application for dismissal,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal be, and
hereby is, granted.
ACCORDINGLY, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause
be, and hereby is, dismissed.

MEDIATION REFERRALS

The following cases have been referred to mediation pursuant to
S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(6):

2004-2051. State ex rel. Stoops Freightliner v. Roop.
Franklin App. No. 03AP-1273.

2005-0562. State ex rel. Brown v. Duramed Pharmaceuticals, Inc..
Franklin App. No. 04AP-81.

2005-0625. Dircksen v. Greene Cty. Bd. of Revision.
Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2004-A-452.

2
04-18-05