04/25/2005 Case Announcements - Ohio Supreme Court Opinion - Ohio Supreme Court Decision

	ROMINGER LEGAL
		Ohio Court Cases and Opinions - Ohio Legal Research
					Need Legal Help?
					Need Legal Help?
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER			LEGAL HEADLINES - CASE LAW - LEGAL FORMS	NOT FINDING WHAT YOU NEED? -RESEARCH

This court case was taken from the web sites of the Ohio Courts. Search our site for more cases - CLICK HERE

LEGAL RESEARCH

COURT REPORTERS

PRIVATE INVESTIGATORS

PROCESS SERVERS

DOCUMENT RETRIEVERS

EXPERT WITNESSES

Find a Private Investigator

Find an Expert Witness

Find a Process Server

Case Law - save on Lexis / WestLaw.

Legal News - Legal Headlines

CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS

April 25, 2005

[Cite as 04/25/2005 Case Announcements, 2005-Ohio-1887.]

MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS

2005-0190. Wears v. Motorists Mut. Ins. Co.
Summit App. No. 22027, 2004-Ohio-6734 and 2005-Ohio-341. This cause is
pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right.
Upon consideration of appellant's application for dismissal,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal be, and
hereby is, granted.

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause
be, and hereby is, dismissed.

2005-0557. Strongsville Bd. of Edn. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision.
Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2003-G-663. This cause is pending before the court as
an appeal from the Board of Tax Appeals. Upon consideration of appellant's
application for dismissal,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal be, and
hereby is, granted.
ACCORDINGLY, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause
be, and hereby is, dismissed.

MISCELLANEOUS ORDERS

In re Report of the Commission

On Continuing Legal Education.

E N T R Y
Andrew David Bowers

(#0071486),

Respondent.

This matter originated in this court on the filing of a report by the
Commission on Continuing Legal Education ("commission") pursuant to Gov.Bar
R. X(6)(A)(1)(b) and (A)(2)(d). The commission recommended the imposition of
sanctions against certain attorneys, including the above-named respondent, for
failure to comply with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. X, Attorney Continuing Legal
Education, for the 2002-2003 reporting period.

On April 8, 2005, this court adopted the recommendation of the
commission, imposed a sanction fee upon the respondent, and suspended the
respondent from the practice of law pursuant to Gov.Bar R. X(6)(B)(3) and
(5)(A)(4). The court further ordered that respondent shall not be reinstated to the
practice of law in Ohio until respondent complies with the requirements for
reinstatement set forth in Gov.Bar R. X(7); respondent complies with the Supreme
Court Rules for the Government of the Bar of Ohio; respondent complies with this
and all other orders of the court; and this court orders respondent reinstated.

On April 19, 2005, the commission filed a recommendation pursuant to
Gov.Bar R. X(7)(B)(2) finding that the respondent has paid all fees assessed for
noncompliance, has made up all deficiencies and is now in full compliance with all
requirements of Gov.Bar R. X, and recommending that the respondent be
reinstated to the practice of law in Ohio. On April 19, 2005, the commission
certified that respondent had completed the credit hours of continuing legal
education required during his suspension by this court's order of suspension. Upon
consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the recommendation of the commission is
adopted and respondent, Andrew David Bowers, is hereby reinstated to the practice
of law.

2
04-25-05