01/21/2005 Case Announcements - Ohio Supreme Court Opinion - Ohio Supreme Court Decision

	ROMINGER LEGAL
		Ohio Court Cases and Opinions - Ohio Legal Research
					Need Legal Help?
					Need Legal Help?
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER			LEGAL HEADLINES - CASE LAW - LEGAL FORMS	NOT FINDING WHAT YOU NEED? -RESEARCH

This court case was taken from the web sites of the Ohio Courts. Search our site for more cases - CLICK HERE

LEGAL RESEARCH

COURT REPORTERS

PRIVATE INVESTIGATORS

PROCESS SERVERS

DOCUMENT RETRIEVERS

EXPERT WITNESSES

Find a Private Investigator

Find an Expert Witness

Find a Process Server

Case Law - save on Lexis / WestLaw.

Legal News - Legal Headlines

CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS

January 21, 2005

[Cite as 01/21/2005 Case Announcements, 2005-Ohio-192.]

MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

2004-0448. State ex rel. Plain Dealer Publishing Co. v. Cleveland.
In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a
writ of mandamus. Oral argument is currently scheduled for February 1, 2005. On
December 28, 2004, this court issued an order consolidating this case with
Supreme Court Case No. 04-1765, State ex rel. The Vindicator Printing Company
v. City of Youngstown, for purposes of oral argument and decision. Upon
consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that oral argument scheduled for
February 1, 2005, be, and hereby is, rescheduled for April 26, 2005.

2005-0085. State ex rel. Mackey v. Blackwell.
Cuyahoga App. No. 85597, 2004-Ohio-7004. This cause is pending before the
court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County. Upon
consideration of appellants' motion for expedited consideration,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion be, and hereby is, denied.

MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS

2004-1707. State ex rel. Marshall v. Indus. Comm.
Franklin App. No. 03AP-1260, 2004-Ohio-5157. This cause is pending before the
court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County. Upon
consideration of appellant's application for dismissal,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal be, and
hereby is, granted.
ACCORDINGLY, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause
be, and hereby is, dismissed.

2004-1845. State v. Hayes.
Hamilton App. No. C-030257. This cause is pending before the court as a
discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right. It appears from the records of the
court that the appellant has not filed a memorandum in support of jurisdiction, due
January 14, 2005 in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court
and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon
consideration thereof,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed
sua sponte.

MEDIATION REFERRALS

The following case has been returned to the regular docket pursuant to
S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(6)(E):

2004-1953. Alcoa, Inc. v. Wilkins.
Board of Tax Appeals, No. 1999-GG-1401.

2
01/21/05