01/31/2005 Case Announcements - Ohio Supreme Court Opinion - Ohio Supreme Court Decision

	ROMINGER LEGAL
		Ohio Court Cases and Opinions - Ohio Legal Research
					Need Legal Help?
					Need Legal Help?
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER			LEGAL HEADLINES - CASE LAW - LEGAL FORMS	NOT FINDING WHAT YOU NEED? -RESEARCH

This court case was taken from the web sites of the Ohio Courts. Search our site for more cases - CLICK HERE

LEGAL RESEARCH

COURT REPORTERS

PRIVATE INVESTIGATORS

PROCESS SERVERS

DOCUMENT RETRIEVERS

EXPERT WITNESSES

Find a Private Investigator

Find an Expert Witness

Find a Process Server

Case Law - save on Lexis / WestLaw.

Legal News - Legal Headlines

CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS

January 31, 2005

[Cite as 01/31/2005 Case Announcements, 2005-Ohio-315.]

MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

2004-0304. Johnson v. Microsoft Corp.
Hamilton App. No. C-020564, 156 Ohio App.3d 249, 2004-Ohio-761. This cause
is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton
County. Upon consideration of the motion of amicus curiae, Ohio Attorney
General Jim Petro, to participate in oral argument scheduled for February 15, 2005,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for leave to participate in oral
argument be, and hereby is, granted, and the amicus curiae shall share the time
allotted to the appellant, Maria Johnson.

2004-1543. Hartman v. Smith.
Wayne App. No. 04CA0043. This cause is pending before the court as a
discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right. On September 16, 2004,
appellant filed a notice that a motion to certify a conflict was pending in the court
of appeals and, pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(A), this court stayed consideration
of the jurisdictional memoranda filed in this appeal. Whereas appellant has neither
notified this court that the court of appeals determined that a conflict does not exist
as provided by S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(B) nor filed a copy of the court of appeals' order
certifying the existence of a conflict as provided by S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(C),
IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that appellant show cause within
fourteen days of the date of this entry why this court should not proceed to
consider the jurisdictional memoranda in this appeal pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R.
III(6).

MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS

2004-0320. Hoover v. Transcontinental Ins. Co.

Greene App. No. 2003CA46, 2004-Ohio-72. This cause is pending before the
court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Greene County. Upon
consideration of appellant's application for dismissal,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal be, and
hereby is, granted.
ACCORDINGLY, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that oral
argument scheduled for February 1, 2005 is cancelled and that this cause be, and
hereby is, dismissed.

2
01/31/05