02/01/2005 Case Announcements - Ohio Supreme Court Opinion - Ohio Supreme Court Decision

	ROMINGER LEGAL
		Ohio Court Cases and Opinions - Ohio Legal Research
					Need Legal Help?
					Need Legal Help?
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER			LEGAL HEADLINES - CASE LAW - LEGAL FORMS	NOT FINDING WHAT YOU NEED? -RESEARCH

This court case was taken from the web sites of the Ohio Courts. Search our site for more cases - CLICK HERE

LEGAL RESEARCH

COURT REPORTERS

PRIVATE INVESTIGATORS

PROCESS SERVERS

DOCUMENT RETRIEVERS

EXPERT WITNESSES

Find a Private Investigator

Find an Expert Witness

Find a Process Server

Case Law - save on Lexis / WestLaw.

Legal News - Legal Headlines

CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS

February 1, 2005

[Cite as 02/01/2005 Case Announcements, 2005-Ohio-330.]

MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

2004-1259. State v. Taylor.
Madison App. No. CA2003-07-025, 2004-Ohio-3171. This cause is pending
before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Madison County.
IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that this cause is held for the
decisions in 2004-1771, State v. Quinones, Cuyahoga App. No. 83720, 2004-Ohio-
4485, and 2004-1568, State v. Foster, Licking App. No. 03CA95, 2004-Ohio-
4209.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the briefing schedule remains
stayed.

2004-1325. State v. Chandler.
Stark App. No. 2003CA00342, 2004-Ohio-3436. This cause is pending before the
court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Stark County.
IT IS ORDERED by the court that oral argument in this case, currently
scheduled for April 27. 2005, is continued until further notice.

2004-1806. State v. Tucker.
Stark App. No. 2002CA00389, 2003-Ohio-5421. This cause is pending before the
court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Stark County. Upon
consideration of appellant's motion for relief from judgment,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion be, and hereby is, denied.

2004-1820. State v. Hedrick.
Summit App. No. 22336. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary
appeal and claimed appeal of right. On October 28, 2004, appellant filed a notice
that a motion to certify a conflict was pending in the court of appeals and, pursuant

to S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(A), this court stayed consideration of the jurisdictional
memoranda filed in this appeal. Whereas appellant has neither notified this court
that the court of appeals determined that a conflict does not exist as provided by
S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(B) nor filed a copy of the court of appeals' order certifying the
existence of a conflict as provided by S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(C),
IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that appellant show cause within
fourteen days of the date of this entry why this court should not proceed to
consider the jurisdictional memoranda in this appeal pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R.
III(6).

MEDIATION REFERRALS

The following case has been referred to mediation pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R.
XIV(6):

2005-0043. State ex rel. Asti v. Ohio Dept. of Youth Serv.
Franklin App. No. 03AP-998, 2004-Ohio-6832.

2
02/01/05